Literature DB >> 15078734

Mandibular advancement devices in 630 men and women with obstructive sleep apnea and snoring: tolerability and predictors of treatment success.

Marie Marklund1, Hans Stenlund, Karl A Franklin.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the tolerability and to find predictors of treatment success for an individually adjusted, one-piece mandibular advancement device in patients with snoring and obstructive sleep apnea.
DESIGN: Prospective study.
SETTING: Departments of Respiratory Medicine and Orthodontics, Umeå University. PATIENTS: Six hundred nineteen of 630 patients (98%), who consecutively received treatment for sleep apnea and snoring from February 1989 to August 2000, were followed up. They had a mean apnea-hypopnea index of 16 (range, 0.0 to 76) and a mean body mass index of 28 (range, 19 to 42). MEASUREMENTS: Interviews, questionnaires, and overnight sleep apnea recordings. Patients with an apnea-hypopnea index of >or=10 in the supine and/or lateral position were considered to have obstructive sleep apnea. A lateral apnea-hypopnea index of < 10, together with a supine apnea-hypopnea index of >or= 10, defined supine-dependent sleep apneas.
RESULTS: One hundred forty-eight of the 619 patients (24%) discontinued treatment. Female gender predicted treatment success, defined as an apnea-hypopnea index of < 10 in both the supine and lateral positions, with an odds ratio of 2.4 (p = 0.01). In the women, the odds ratios for treatment success were 12 for mild sleep apnea (p = 0.04), and 0.1 for complaints of nasal obstruction (p = 0.03). In the men, the odds ratios for treatment success were 6.0 for supine-dependent sleep apneas (p < 0.001), 2.5 for mild sleep apnea (p = 0.04), 1.3 for each millimeter of mandibular advancement (p = 0.03), and 0.8 for each kilogram of weight increase (p = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The mandibular advancement device is recommended for women with sleep apnea, for men with supine-dependent sleep apneas defined by a lateral apnea-hypopnea index of < 10, and for snorers without sleep apnea. Men who increase in weight during treatment reduce their chance of treatment success and are advised to be followed up with a new sleep apnea recording with the device.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15078734     DOI: 10.1378/chest.125.4.1270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  87 in total

1.  Complexity and efficacy of mandibular advancement splints: understanding their mode of action.

Authors:  Fernanda Ribeiro de Almeida
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 4.062

2.  Oral appliance versus continuous positive airway pressure in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: a 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Michiel H J Doff; Aarnoud Hoekema; Peter J Wijkstra; Johannes H van der Hoeven; James J R Huddleston Slater; Lambert G M de Bont; Boudewijn Stegenga
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 5.849

3.  Comparison of adjustable and fixed oral appliances for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Christopher J Lettieri; Nathalie Paolino; Arn H Eliasson; Anita A Shah; Aaron B Holley
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 4.062

4.  Cephalometry and prediction of oral appliance treatment outcome.

Authors:  Andrew Tze Ming Ng; M Ali Darendeliler; Peter Petocz; Peter A Cistulli
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2011-03-19       Impact factor: 2.816

5.  Influencing factors on the effect of mandibular advancement device in obstructive sleep apnea patients: analysis on cephalometric and polysomnographic parameters.

Authors:  Young-Kyun Kim; Jeong-Whun Kim; In-Young Yoon; Chae Seo Rhee; Chul Hee Lee; Pil-Young Yun
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 2.816

6.  Long-term effectiveness and compliance of positional therapy with the sleep position trainer in the treatment of positional obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.

Authors:  J Peter van Maanen; Nico de Vries
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 5.849

7.  Treatment outcomes of mandibular advancement devices in positional and nonpositional OSA patients.

Authors:  Jin Woo Chung; Reyes Enciso; Daniel J Levendowski; Todd D Morgan; Philip R Westbrook; Glenn T Clark
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2010-03-17

8.  Mandibular tori size is related to obstructive sleep apnea and treatment success with an oral appliance.

Authors:  Emma Palm; Karl A Franklin; Marie Marklund
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 2.816

9.  Influence of nasal resistance on oral appliance treatment outcome in obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Biao Zeng; Andrew T Ng; Jin Qian; Peter Petocz; M Ali Darendeliler; Peter A Cistulli
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.849

10.  The tongue-retaining device: efficacy and side effects in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.

Authors:  Diane S Lazard; Marc Blumen; Pierre Lévy; Pierre Chauvin; Dorothée Fragny; Isabelle Buchet; Frédéric Chabolle
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 4.062

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.