Literature DB >> 15076771

Sensory ERPs predict differences in working memory span and fluid intelligence.

Carrie R Brumback1, Kathy A Low, Gabriele Gratton, Monica Fabiani.   

Abstract

The way our brain reacts to sensory stimulation may provide important clues about higher-level cognitive function and its operation. Here we show that short-latency (< 200 ms) sensory cortical responses elicited by visual and auditory stimuli differ dramatically between subjects with high and low working-memory span, as well as between subjects scoring high and low on a fluid intelligence test. Our findings also suggest that this link between sensory responses and complex cognitive tasks is modality specific (visual sensory measures correlate with visuo-spatial tasks whereas auditory sensory measures correlate with verbal tasks). We interpret these findings as indicating that people's effectiveness in controlling attention and gating sensory information is a critical determinant of individual differences in complex cognitive abilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15076771     DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200402090-00032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  7 in total

1.  Altered N100-potential associates with working memory impairment in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Tua Annanmaki; Kirsi Palmu; Kari Murros; Juhani Partanen
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 3.575

2.  Cortical potentials in an auditory oddball task reflect individual differences in working memory capacity.

Authors:  Kate A Yurgil; Edward J Golob
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Regulating the Access to Awareness: Brain Activity Related to Probe-related and Spontaneous Reversals in Binocular Rivalry.

Authors:  Brian A Metzger; Kyle E Mathewson; Evelina Tapia; Monica Fabiani; Gabriele Gratton; Diane M Beck
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  P50, N100, and P200 sensory gating: relationships with behavioral inhibition, attention, and working memory.

Authors:  Marijn Lijffijt; Scott D Lane; Stacey L Meier; Nash N Boutros; Scott Burroughs; Joel L Steinberg; F Gerard Moeller; Alan C Swann
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  P50 sensory gating is related to performance on select tasks of cognitive inhibition.

Authors:  Carly A Yadon; Julie M Bugg; Michael A Kisley; Deana B Davalos
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Age-related changes in electrophysiological and neuropsychological indices of working memory, attention control, and cognitive flexibility.

Authors:  Carrie Brumback Peltz; Gabriele Gratton; Monica Fabiani
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-08-18

7.  Spatio-Temporal Brain Dynamic Differences in Fluid Intelligence.

Authors:  Nadja Tschentscher; Paul Sauseng
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 3.169

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.