Literature DB >> 15076584

Morphologic characteristics of acetabular dysplasia in proximal femoral focal deficiency.

Claudio Dora1, Martin Bühler, Michael D Stover, Mohamed N Mahomed, Reinhold Ganz.   

Abstract

A retrospective radiographic analysis of the acetabulum of 13 patients (14 hips) with proximal femoral focal deficiency (PFFD), clinically classified into Gillespie and Torode type 1, was performed to better understand its morphologic features at maturity. The version of the proximal part of the acetabulum was determined quantitatively and qualitatively. All 14 hips showed residual or borderline acetabular dysplasia with a mean lateral centre-edge angle of -1.5degrees and an acetabular index of 30degrees. The acetabular dome was retroverted in all hips and averaged -24degrees. Acetabular deficiency compared with the opposite side, while not present with respect to the anterior wall, averaged 12% with respect to the posterior wall. Dysplasia associated with type 1 PFFD is therefore fundamentally different from that seen in developmental residual hip dysplasia. Clinically, despite radiographic evidence of dysplasia, 57% were without clinical manifestations of hip pathology. This may be due to a number of factors including age of last radiograph, severity of dysplasia, and the decreased functional demand placed on the hip in some individuals with associated malformations. For the symptomatic hip, the posterior insufficiency and relative retroversion of the acetabular dome should be taken into consideration in planning reorientation procedures. This can help to prevent problems of persistent subluxation or acetabulo-femoral impingement following reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15076584     DOI: 10.1097/00009957-200403000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B        ISSN: 1060-152X            Impact factor:   1.041


  7 in total

1.  Reliability of radiographic signs for acetabular retroversion.

Authors:  Thomas Kappe; Tugrul Kocak; Carl Neuerburg; Sabine Lippacher; Ralf Bieger; Heiko Reichel
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  [Femoroacetabular impingement: trigger for the development of coxarthrosis].

Authors:  M Leunig; M Beck; C Dora; R Ganz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Acetabular changes in coxa vara.

Authors:  Ashish Ranade; James J McCarthy; Richard S Davidson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Proximal focal femoral deficiency: evaluation by MR imaging.

Authors:  David M Biko; Richard Davidson; Andres Pena; Diego Jaramillo
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-09-10

5.  Is acetabular dysplasia and pelvic deformity properly interpreted in patients with congenital femoral deficiency? A 3D analysis of pelvic computed tomography.

Authors:  Bartosz Jan Musielak; Milud Shadi; Anna Maria Kubicka; Paweł Koczewski; Michał Rychlik; Pirunthi Premakumaran; Marek Jóźwiak
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 1.548

6.  Femoral morphology differs between deficient and excessive acetabular coverage.

Authors:  S D Steppacher; M Tannast; S Werlen; K A Siebenrock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  [FAI - concept and etiology].

Authors:  M Leunig; R Ganz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.087

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.