Literature DB >> 15076289

Complications of post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testis cancer.

Ashraf A Mosharafa1, Richard S Foster, Michael O Koch, Richard Bihrle, John P Donohue.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC RPLND) is a tool in the management of testis cancer. Our impression has been that the short-term morbidity of standard PC RPLND has diminished with time. Therefore, we attempted to verify this hypothesis by evaluating the morbidity of the procedure in 2 comparable groups of patients from 2 different periods.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared 150 patients who underwent post-chemotherapy RPLND between July 2000 and July 2002 to 79 patients who underwent the same procedure between 1990 to 1992. All patients had clinical stage II-III testis cancer and had received 3 to 4 courses of standard platinum based chemotherapy before surgery. We compared surgical morbidity and postoperative complications in both groups. We also assessed a number of factors (patient characteristics, mass size, pathological features and surgical aspects) that could impact the rate of complications.
RESULTS: The 2 groups were comparable regarding preoperative clinical stage, patient characteristics and postoperative pathological findings. PC RPLND procedures were performed using the same technique. Compared to patients in the 1990 to 1992 group, the patients from the 2000 to 2002 group had fewer intraoperative complications and additional procedures (44 [29.3%] of 150 versus 41 [51.9%] of 79, p = 0.0008), a trend toward a lower postoperative complication rate (10 [6.7%] compared to 11 [13.9%], p = 0.07) and shorter hospital stay (average 5.6 versus 8.4 days [p <0.0001]).
CONCLUSIONS: With time morbidity and hospital stay after standard PC RPLND have decreased. This finding probably reflects differences in patterns of care rather than changes in surgical technique. Therefore, comparing newer surgical techniques to historical controls is inappropriate since differences may not actually represent the technical advances of the newer procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15076289     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000120141.89737.90

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  19 in total

1.  [Management of complications after residual tumor resection for metastatic testicular cancer].

Authors:  A Lusch; M Zaum; C Winter; P Albers
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  [Interdisciplinary cooperation in the treatment of complex patients with advanced testicular germ cell tumor].

Authors:  A Heidenreich; S Krege; M Flasshove
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  External validation of the Heidenreich criteria for patient selection for unilateral or bilateral retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for post-chemotherapy residual masses of testicular cancer.

Authors:  Cédric Vallier; Pierre-Henri Savoie; Jean-Robert Delpero; Franck Bladou; Gwenaëlle Gravis; Naji Salem; Dominique Rossi; Jochen Walz
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Frontiers in robot-assisted retroperitoneal oncological surgery.

Authors:  Wesley W Ludwig; Michael A Gorin; Phillip M Pierorazio; Mohamad E Allaf
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  [Post-chemotherapy laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in low volume residual germ cell cancer: a technique to reduce morbidity].

Authors:  S Aufderklamm; T Todenhöfer; J Hennenlotter; G Gakis; J Mischinger; J Mundhenk; M Germann; A Stenzl; C Schwentner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  Management of residual mass in nonseminomatous germ cell tumors following chemotherapy.

Authors:  Siamak Daneshmand; Hooman Djaladat; Craig Nichols
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2011-08

7.  [Complex residual tumors after chemotherapy of nonseminomatous germ cell tumors. Laparoscopic management - limits and chances].

Authors:  S Aufderklamm; T Todenhöfer; J Hennenlotter; J Mischinger; A Sim; J Böttge; S Rausch; S Bier; O Halalsheh; A Stenzl; G Gakis; C Schwentner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 8.  Surgical removal of retroperitoneal tumors after chemotherapy treated testicular tumors.

Authors:  Allen Sim; Stefan Aufderklamm; Omar Halalsheh; Tilman Todenhöfer; Christian Schwentner
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.092

9.  Therapeutic supine robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for post-chemotherapy residual masses in testicular cancer: technique and outcome analysis of initial experience.

Authors:  Ashwin Sunil Tamhankar; Saurabh Ramesh Patil; Surya Prakash Ojha; Puneet Ahluwalia; Gagan Gautam
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2019-01-17

Review 10.  Complications of laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in testicular cancer.

Authors:  Patrick A Kenney; Ingolf A Tuerk
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.