Literature DB >> 15075836

Robotics in urology.

Ashok K Hemal1, Mani Menon.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Robotic urologic surgery, an exciting and new emerging frontier in the field of urology, has tremendous potential to progress in the future. It is important, therefore, that urologists keep abreast of the new technologies, their limitations, and the possibility of incorporating them in day-to-day surgery. There are a substantial number of reports on performing complex urological procedures with robotic assistance in humans that document their safety, efficacy and feasibility. RECENT
FINDINGS: Most of the recent reports pertaining to robotic surgery have been in the domain of localized cancer of the prostate (radical prostatectomy), bladder cancer (radical cystectomy and urinary diversion for muscle invasive bladder cancer), kidney surgery (nephrectomy, donor nephrectomy and pyeloplasty), and adrenal surgery. There are also a few anecdotal reports.
SUMMARY: With the potential advantages and latent qualities of robotic assistance in minimally invasive surgery over conventional surgery, robot-assisted surgeries may be developed to the next level and lead to a future revolution of the way surgery is performed. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in the management of localized cancer of the prostate is one such example. The impact of robotics is therefore very promising. However, controlled clinical trials and comparisons from various centers are needed. Other important concerns are the cost and training implications. Future application may also allow integration of pre- and intraoperative imaging in the management of urological diseases. In the not too distant future, newer robotic instruments will be added to the armamentarium for performing different urological procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15075836     DOI: 10.1097/00042307-200403000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Urol        ISSN: 0963-0643            Impact factor:   2.309


  21 in total

1.  Major urological oncological surgeries can be performed using minimally invasive robotic or laparoscopic methods with similar early perioperative outcomes compared to conventional open methods.

Authors:  Samuel Sterrett; Tony Mammen; Tanya Nazemi; Anton Galich; Gregory Peters; Lynette Smith; K C Balaji
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  [Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy].

Authors:  A Mottrie; P Schatteman; E Fonteyne; J Rotering; M Stöckle; S Siemer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  A consensus document on robotic surgery.

Authors:  D M Herron; M Marohn
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Fellow or foe: the impact of fellowship training programs on the education of Canadian urology residents.

Authors:  Ethan D Grober; Dean S Elterman; Michael A S Jewett
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  The emergence of surgeon-controlled robotic surgery in urologic oncology.

Authors:  Timil H Patel; Paurush Babbar; Ashok K Hemal
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-12-07

6.  Indications for the gasless transaxillary robotic approach to thyroid surgery: experience of forty-seven procedures at the american hospital of paris.

Authors:  Patrick Aidan; Helen Pickburn; Hervé Monpeyssen; Gilles Boccara
Journal:  Eur Thyroid J       Date:  2013-06-14

7.  The patterns and costs of the Da Vinci robotic surgery system in a large academic institution.

Authors:  Rhonda Prewitt; Victor Bochkarev; Corrigan L McBride; Sonja Kinney; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2008-04-02

8.  Impact of newer unidirectional and bidirectional barbed suture on vesicourethral anastomosis during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and its comparison with polyglecaprone-25 suture: an initial experience.

Authors:  Ashok K Hemal; Mayank Mohan Agarwal; P Babbar
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  A prospective comparison of laparoscopic and robotic radical nephrectomy for T1-2N0M0 renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Ashok K Hemal; Anup Kumar
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 10.  Orthognathic model surgery by using of a passive Robot Arm.

Authors:  Esam Ahmad Z Omar; M A Bamber
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2010-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.