BACKGROUND: The regimens of carboplatin plus paclitaxel (CP) and methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (M-VAC) were compared in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma. METHODS:Patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma were randomized to receive either CP (paclitaxel at a dose of 225 mg/m(2) and carboplatin [targeted area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 6] given every 21 days) or the standard M-VAC dosage. RESULTS:Eighty-five patients were randomized to the respective treatment regimens (41 to CP and 44 to M-VAC). Response rates and overall survival were similar for both treatment arms. Patients treated with CP had an overall response rate of 28.2% (95% binomial confidence interval, 15.0-44.9%) compared with an overall response rate of 35.9% for the M-VAC arm (95% binomial confidence interval, 21.2-52.8%) (P = 0.63, Fisher exact test). The median progression-free survival among patients who were treated with M-VAC was 8.7 months and was 5.2 months for patients receiving CP (P = 0.24, log-rank test). At a median follow-up of 32.5 months, the median survival for patients treated with M-VAC was 15.4 months versus 13.8 months for patients treated with CP (P = 0.65, log-rank test). Patients treated with M-VAC were found to have more severe worst-degree toxicities compared with patients treated with CP (P = 0.0001). There were no significant differences with regard to quality of life as assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bladder (FACT-BL) instrument (P = 0.33). CONCLUSIONS: Interpretation of the results of this study must be made with caution because the study failed to reach its accrual goal. Patients treated with CP had a median survival of 13.8 months compared with 15.4 months for patients treated with M-VAC. Patients treated with CP appeared in general to better tolerate their treatment; however, there were no significant differences noted with regard to measured quality of life parameters. Copyright 2004 American Cancer Society.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The regimens of carboplatin plus paclitaxel (CP) and methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (M-VAC) were compared in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma. METHODS:Patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma were randomized to receive either CP (paclitaxel at a dose of 225 mg/m(2) and carboplatin [targeted area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 6] given every 21 days) or the standard M-VAC dosage. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients were randomized to the respective treatment regimens (41 to CP and 44 to M-VAC). Response rates and overall survival were similar for both treatment arms. Patients treated with CP had an overall response rate of 28.2% (95% binomial confidence interval, 15.0-44.9%) compared with an overall response rate of 35.9% for the M-VAC arm (95% binomial confidence interval, 21.2-52.8%) (P = 0.63, Fisher exact test). The median progression-free survival among patients who were treated with M-VAC was 8.7 months and was 5.2 months for patients receiving CP (P = 0.24, log-rank test). At a median follow-up of 32.5 months, the median survival for patients treated with M-VAC was 15.4 months versus 13.8 months for patients treated with CP (P = 0.65, log-rank test). Patients treated with M-VAC were found to have more severe worst-degree toxicities compared with patients treated with CP (P = 0.0001). There were no significant differences with regard to quality of life as assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bladder (FACT-BL) instrument (P = 0.33). CONCLUSIONS: Interpretation of the results of this study must be made with caution because the study failed to reach its accrual goal. Patients treated with CP had a median survival of 13.8 months compared with 15.4 months for patients treated with M-VAC. Patients treated with CP appeared in general to better tolerate their treatment; however, there were no significant differences noted with regard to measured quality of life parameters. Copyright 2004 American Cancer Society.
Authors: Andrea B Apolo; Irina Ostrovnaya; Susan Halabi; Alexia Iasonos; George K Philips; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Jamie Riches; Eric J Small; Matthew I Milowsky; Dean F Bajorin Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2013-02-14 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Walter M Stadler; David J Vaughn; Guru Sonpavde; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Scott T Tagawa; Daniel P Petrylak; Peter Rosen; Chia-Chi Lin; John Mahoney; Sanjiv Modi; Peter Lee; Marc S Ernstoff; Wu-Chou Su; Alexander Spira; Korinna Pilz; Richard Vinisko; Charles Schloss; Holger Fritsch; Charles Zhao; Michael A Carducci Journal: Cancer Date: 2013-12-11 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Jung Yong Hong; Moon Ki Choi; Ji Eun Uhm; Min Jae Park; Jeeyun Lee; Se Hoon Park; Joon Oh Park; Won Seog Kim; Won Ki Kang; Hyun Moo Lee; Han Yong Choi; Hoyeong Lim Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2008-11-06 Impact factor: 3.064
Authors: Maria De Santis; Joaquim Bellmunt; Graham Mead; J Martijn Kerst; Michael Leahy; Pablo Maroto; Iwona Skoneczna; Sandrine Marreaud; Ronald de Wit; Richard Sylvester Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-09-28 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: M N Pham; A B Apolo; M De Santis; M D Galsky; B C Leibovich; L L Pisters; A O Siefker-Radtke; G Sonpavde; G D Steinberg; C N Sternberg; S T Tagawa; A Z Weizer; M E Woods; M I Milowsky Journal: World J Urol Date: 2016-06-24 Impact factor: 4.226