BACKGROUND: Polo-like kinases (Plks) control multiple steps during the cell cycle, and Plk1 is overexpressed in urothelial cancer (UC). Volasertib (BI 6727), a Plk inhibitor, has demonstrated antitumor activity in several malignancies, including UC. In this phase 2 trial, the authors investigated volasertib as a second-line treatment in advanced/metastatic UC. METHODS: Patients who progressed within 2 years of 1 prior chemotherapy regimen received 300 mg volasertib on day 1 every 3 weeks. The dose was escalated to 350 mg in cycle 2 if volasertib was tolerated in cycle 1. The primary endpoint was tumor response, which was assessed every 6 weeks; secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, overall survival, duration of response, safety, and pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: Fifty patients were enrolled, and the median patient age was 68.5 years (range, 52-83 years). All patients had received prior platinum, 94% of patients had relapsed ≤2 years after prior therapy, 36% had liver metastases, and 54% had lung metastases. The median number of treatment cycles was 2 (range, 1-27 treatment cycles), and 23 patients were dose escalated at cycle 2. Seven patients (14%) had a partial response, 13 (26%) had stable disease, and 30 (60%) progressed within 6 weeks. The median response duration was 41 weeks (range, 29.1-77.3 weeks). The median progression-free survival was 1.4 months, and the median overall survival was 8.5 months. The most frequent grade 3 and 4 adverse events were neutropenia (28%), thrombocytopenia (20%), and anemia (16%). No cumulative toxicity was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Volasertib as second-line treatment for advanced/metastatic UC had an acceptable safety profile but demonstrated insufficient antitumor activity for further evaluation as a monotherapy.
BACKGROUND: Polo-like kinases (Plks) control multiple steps during the cell cycle, and Plk1 is overexpressed in urothelial cancer (UC). Volasertib (BI 6727), a Plk inhibitor, has demonstrated antitumor activity in several malignancies, including UC. In this phase 2 trial, the authors investigated volasertib as a second-line treatment in advanced/metastatic UC. METHODS:Patients who progressed within 2 years of 1 prior chemotherapy regimen received 300 mg volasertib on day 1 every 3 weeks. The dose was escalated to 350 mg in cycle 2 if volasertib was tolerated in cycle 1. The primary endpoint was tumor response, which was assessed every 6 weeks; secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, overall survival, duration of response, safety, and pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: Fifty patients were enrolled, and the median patient age was 68.5 years (range, 52-83 years). All patients had received prior platinum, 94% of patients had relapsed ≤2 years after prior therapy, 36% had liver metastases, and 54% had lung metastases. The median number of treatment cycles was 2 (range, 1-27 treatment cycles), and 23 patients were dose escalated at cycle 2. Seven patients (14%) had a partial response, 13 (26%) had stable disease, and 30 (60%) progressed within 6 weeks. The median response duration was 41 weeks (range, 29.1-77.3 weeks). The median progression-free survival was 1.4 months, and the median overall survival was 8.5 months. The most frequent grade 3 and 4 adverse events were neutropenia (28%), thrombocytopenia (20%), and anemia (16%). No cumulative toxicity was observed. CONCLUSIONS:Volasertib as second-line treatment for advanced/metastatic UC had an acceptable safety profile but demonstrated insufficient antitumor activity for further evaluation as a monotherapy.
Authors: Guru Sonpavde; Cora N Sternberg; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Noah M Hahn; Matthew D Galsky; Nicholas J Vogelzang Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2010-05-25 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Joaquim Bellmunt; Hans von der Maase; Graham M Mead; Iwona Skoneczna; Maria De Santis; Gedske Daugaard; Andreas Boehle; Christine Chevreau; Luis Paz-Ares; Leslie R Laufman; Eric Winquist; Derek Raghavan; Sandrine Marreaud; Sandra Collette; Richard Sylvester; Ronald de Wit Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-02-27 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Joaquim Bellmunt; Toni K Choueiri; Ronan Fougeray; Fabio A B Schutz; Yacine Salhi; Eric Winquist; Stéphane Culine; Hans von der Maase; David J Vaughn; Jonathan E Rosenberg Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-03-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Maria De Santis; Joaquim Bellmunt; Graham Mead; J Martijn Kerst; Michael Leahy; Pablo Maroto; Iwona Skoneczna; Sandrine Marreaud; Ronald de Wit; Richard Sylvester Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-09-28 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Dorothea Rudolph; Martin Steegmaier; Matthias Hoffmann; Matthias Grauert; Anke Baum; Jens Quant; Christian Haslinger; Pilar Garin-Chesa; Günther R Adolf Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-04-21 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Yuan Ren; Chengfeng Bi; Xiaohong Zhao; Tint Lwin; Cheng Wang; Ji Yuan; Ariosto S Silva; Bijal D Shah; Bin Fang; Tao Li; John M Koomen; Huijuan Jiang; Julio C Chavez; Lan V Pham; Praneeth R Sudalagunta; Lixin Wan; Xuefeng Wang; William S Dalton; Lynn C Moscinski; Kenneth H Shain; Julie Vose; John L Cleveland; Eduardo M Sotomayor; Kai Fu; Jianguo Tao Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2018-11-05 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: M J Fernández-Aceñero; D Cortés; T Gómez del Pulgar; A Cebrián; L Estrada; J Martínez-Useros; A Celdrán; J García-Foncillas; C Pastor Journal: Pathol Oncol Res Date: 2015-11-17 Impact factor: 3.201
Authors: Renata Ferrarotto; Ruchitha Goonatilake; Suk Young Yoo; Pan Tong; Uma Giri; Shaohua Peng; John Minna; Luc Girard; Yuehong Wang; Liguang Wang; Lerong Li; Lixia Diao; David H Peng; Don L Gibbons; Bonnie S Glisson; John V Heymach; Jing Wang; Lauren A Byers; Faye M Johnson Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2015-11-23 Impact factor: 12.531