Literature DB >> 1507156

The refractive development of the eye of the American kestrel (Falco sparverius): a new avian model.

M E Andison1, J G Sivak, D M Bird.   

Abstract

Most measures of avian visual performance are carried out on commonly available domestic species such as the chicken, and most of the data on avian induced refractive error deals with chickens. Raptors are predatory birds in which good visual resolving ability is particularly important. Behavioral studies indicate that the eyes of raptors have two to three times the resolving ability of the human eye. The domestic chicken is precocial at hatching whereas most raptors are semi-altricial. This study was an effort to determine if the effect of early visual deprivation on the refractive development of the chicken eye can be reproduced in the American kestrel, a species which is not domesticated and in which the need for acute vision is particularly important. Visual deprivation was achieved by unilaterally applying translucent plastic goggles over the eyes of kestrels two days after hatching. Refractive error was measured using a retinoscope and trial lenses. Ocular growth was monitored by A-scan ultrasonography, and frozen ocular sections of sacrificed birds. The effect of the experimental manipulation on the contralateral control eye and body weight was evaluated each day over a 42-day period. The goggles did not significantly affect the normal changes in body weight or the normal pattern of ocular growth and refractive development in the untreated eyes. An analysis of the refractive state changes as a result of form deprivation was made each week for 6 weeks after hatching on both the treated and untreated eyes in a separate group of experimental birds. Visual form deprivation caused a significant myopic shift in refractive error and a significant increase in the vitreous chamber depth in the treated eyes at 3 and 6 weeks of age. However, the amount of myopia produced is much less than that induced in chicks, and in certain cases hyperopia is produced. The kestrels recover from myopia and hyperopia within 10 days of goggle removal, after 3 to 4 weeks of deprivation. This study is the first indication that chickens may not be a representative bird model for studying form-deprivation myopia. First, myopia is not always produced in kestrels in response to form deprivation. Second, kestrels are severely myopic at hatching and therefore, the direction of emmetropization is opposite to that found in hatchling chicks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1507156     DOI: 10.1007/bf00199333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  25 in total

1.  Increase in axial length of the macaque monkey eye after corneal opacification.

Authors:  T N Wiesel; E Raviola
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  The "visual cliff".

Authors:  E J GIBSON; R D WALK
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1960-04       Impact factor: 2.142

Review 3.  Avian models of experimental myopia: environmental factors in the regulation of eye growth.

Authors:  W Hodos
Journal:  Ciba Found Symp       Date:  1990

4.  Experimentally induced myopia in chicks: morphometric and biochemical analysis during the first 14 days after hatching.

Authors:  R L Pickett-Seltner; J G Sivak; J J Pasternak
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Developmental aspects of experimental myopia in chicks: susceptibility, recovery and relation to emmetropization.

Authors:  J Wallman; J I Adams
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Light induced alterations in growth pattern of the avian eye.

Authors:  A B Bercovitz; P C Harrison; G A Leary
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Myopia and eye enlargement after neonatal lid fusion in monkeys.

Authors:  T N Wiesel; E Raviola
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1977-03-03       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  Neural control of eye growth and experimental myopia in primates.

Authors:  E Raviola; T N Wiesel
Journal:  Ciba Found Symp       Date:  1990

9.  Natural accommodation in the growing chicken.

Authors:  F Schaeffel; H C Howland; L Farkas
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Inducing myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism in chicks.

Authors:  E L Irving; M G Callender; J G Sivak
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 1.973

View more
  13 in total

1.  The development of the refractive state in the newborn Thomson gazelle.

Authors:  R Ofri; S Millodot; Y Tadmor; E Matalon; P H Kass; I H Horowitz; M Millodot
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-08-12       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Chick eye optics: zero to fourteen days.

Authors:  E L Irving; J G Sivak; T A Curry; M G Callender
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  The role of temporal contrast and blue light in emmetropization.

Authors:  Frances Rucker; Mark Henriksen; Tiffany Yanase; Christopher Taylor
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Long-wavelength (red) light produces hyperopia in juvenile and adolescent tree shrews.

Authors:  Timothy J Gawne; Alexander H Ward; Thomas T Norton
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Selective regulation of MMP and TIMP mRNA levels in tree shrew sclera during minus lens compensation and recovery.

Authors:  John T Siegwart; Thomas T Norton
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 6.  Perspective: how might emmetropization and genetic factors produce myopia in normal eyes?

Authors:  John T Siegwart; Thomas T Norton
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Nature of the refractive errors in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) with experimentally induced ametropias.

Authors:  Ying Qiao-Grider; Li-Fang Hung; Chea-Su Kee; Ramkumar Ramamirtham; Earl L Smith
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Binocular lens treatment in tree shrews: Effect of age and comparison of plus lens wear with recovery from minus lens-induced myopia.

Authors:  John T Siegwart; Thomas T Norton
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2010-08-14       Impact factor: 3.467

9.  Response to interrupted hyperopia after restraint of axial elongation in tree shrews.

Authors:  John T Siegwart; Thomas T Norton
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  The time course of changes in mRNA levels in tree shrew sclera during induced myopia and recovery.

Authors:  John T Siegwart; Thomas T Norton
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.