Literature DB >> 1507135

The UCLA abutment: a four-year review.

S G Lewis1, D Llamas, S Avera.   

Abstract

The UCLA abutment has been used over the past 4 years in the restoration of osseointegrated implants. The design of the abutment allows fabrication of the restoration directly to the implant fixture, bypassing the transmucosal abutment cylinder. This technique is valuable in overcoming problems of limited interocclusal distance, interproximal distance, implant angulation, and soft tissue response. Another major advantage with the UCLA abutment is that of improved esthetics. After treatment of 46 patients with 118 UCLA abutments, the 4-year success rates are 95.8%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1507135     DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(92)90082-l

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  7 in total

1.  Comparative Evaluation of Two Different Types of Abutments in Relation to Post-prosthetic Bone Resorption and Periodontal Pocket Depth: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial With a One-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Mohammad Anas Almodalal; Mhd Luai Morad; Mohammad Y Hajeer; Munir Harfouche
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-06-10

Review 2.  Osseointegrated Metallic Implants for Finger Amputees: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Chiara Bregoli; Carlo Alberto Biffi; Kavin Morellato; Emanuele Gruppioni; Matteo Primavera; Michele Rampoldi; Mario Lando; Roberto Adani; Ausonio Tuissi
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 3.  Screw-retained crown restorations of single implants: A step-by-step clinical guide.

Authors:  Mohammad Assaf; Alaa' Z Abu Gharbyeh
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2014-10

4.  Effect of cyclic load on vertical misfit of prefabricated and cast implant single abutment.

Authors:  Rudys Rodolfo de Jesus Tavarez; Wellington Cardoso Bonachela; Anuar Antônio Xible
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

5.  Evaluation of stability of interface between CCM (Co-Cr-Mo) UCLA abutment and external hex implant.

Authors:  Ki-Joon Yoon; Young-Bum Park; Hyunmin Choi; Youngsung Cho; Jae-Hoon Lee; Keun-Woo Lee
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 1.904

6.  Soft Tissue Interface with Various Kinds of Implant Abutment Materials.

Authors:  Akihiro Furuhashi; Yasunori Ayukawa; Ikiru Atsuta; Yunia Dwi Rakhmatia; Kiyoshi Koyano
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Influence of Luting Materials on the Retention of Cemented Implant-Supported Crowns: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Ella A Naumova; Felix Roth; Berit Geis; Christine Baulig; Wolfgang H Arnold; Andree Piwowarczyk
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 3.623

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.