Literature DB >> 15071087

Temporal sparseness of the premotor drive is important for rapid learning in a neural network model of birdsong.

Ila R Fiete1, Richard H R Hahnloser, Michale S Fee, H Sebastian Seung.   

Abstract

Sparse neural codes have been widely observed in cortical sensory and motor areas. A striking example of sparse temporal coding is in the song-related premotor area high vocal center (HVC) of songbirds: The motor neurons innervating avian vocal muscles are driven by premotor nucleus robustus archistriatalis (RA), which is in turn driven by nucleus HVC. Recent experiments reveal that RA-projecting HVC neurons fire just one burst per song motif. However, the function of this remarkable temporal sparseness has remained unclear. Because birdsong is a clear example of a learned complex motor behavior, we explore in a neural network model with the help of numerical and analytical techniques the possible role of sparse premotor neural codes in song-related motor learning. In numerical simulations with nonlinear neurons, as HVC activity is made progressively less sparse, the minimum learning time increases significantly. Heuristically, this slowdown arises from increasing interference in the weight updates for different synapses. If activity in HVC is sparse, synaptic interference is reduced, and is minimized if each synapse from HVC to RA is used only once in the motif, which is the situation observed experimentally. Our numerical results are corroborated by a theoretical analysis of learning in linear networks, for which we derive a relationship between sparse activity, synaptic interference, and learning time. If songbirds acquire their songs under significant pressure to learn quickly, this study predicts that HVC activity, currently measured only in adults, should also be sparse during the sensorimotor phase in the juvenile bird. We discuss the relevance of these results, linking sparse codes and learning speed, to other multilayered sensory and motor systems.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15071087     DOI: 10.1152/jn.01133.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  37 in total

1.  Dynamic afferent synapses to decision-making networks improve performance in tasks requiring stimulus associations and discriminations.

Authors:  Mark A Bourjaily; Paul Miller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Degenerate coding in neural systems.

Authors:  Anthony Leonardo
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Three channels of corticothalamic communication during locomotion.

Authors:  Mikhail G Sirota; Harvey A Swadlow; Irina N Beloozerova
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-06-22       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Precise rhythmicity in activity of neocortical, thalamic and brain stem neurons in behaving cats and rabbits.

Authors:  Witali L Dunin-Barkowski; Mikhail G Sirota; Andrew T Lovering; John M Orem; Edward H Vidruk; Irina N Beloozerova
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 5.  How silent is the brain: is there a "dark matter" problem in neuroscience?

Authors:  Shy Shoham; Daniel H O'Connor; Ronen Segev
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-03-21       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 6.  Neuromechanics of muscle synergies for posture and movement.

Authors:  Lena H Ting; J Lucas McKay
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 6.627

7.  Imaging a population code for odor identity in the Drosophila mushroom body.

Authors:  Robert A A Campbell; Kyle S Honegger; Hongtao Qin; Wanhe Li; Ebru Demir; Glenn C Turner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  A hypothesis for basal ganglia-dependent reinforcement learning in the songbird.

Authors:  M S Fee; J H Goldberg
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Brain stem feedback in a computational model of birdsong sequencing.

Authors:  Leif Gibb; Timothy Q Gentner; Henry D I Abarbanel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  A neural circuit mechanism for regulating vocal variability during song learning in zebra finches.

Authors:  Jonathan Garst-Orozco; Baktash Babadi; Bence P Ölveczky
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.