Literature DB >> 15070870

Can biological or clinical parameters predict testicular sperm recovery in 47,XXY Klinefelter's syndrome patients?

V Vernaeve1, C Staessen, G Verheyen, A Van Steirteghem, P Devroey, H Tournaye.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Contradictory results are available regarding prediction of testicular sperm extraction in 47,XXY patients. This study, therefore, aimed at assessing the availability of testicular sperm and evaluates clinical parameters predicting successful sperm retrieval in azoospermic 47,XXY Klinefelter's syndrome patients.
METHODS: Sperm recovery procedures were performed in 50 non-mosaic azoospermic Klinefelter patients. The facial hair pattern and the presence of gynaecomastia in men with successful and unsuccessful sperm recovery were compared using Fisher's exact test. The predictive value of clinical parameters such as age, testicular volume, FSH, FSH:LH ratio, testosterone and androgen sensitivity index (LH x testosterone) for successful testicular sperm retrieval was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis.
RESULTS: In 24 patients (48%) testicular sperm were recovered. Ninety-four per cent of the men in whom sperm was found had a normal facial hair pattern compared to 93% in whom no sperm was recovered (not significant, NS). Seventeen percent of the men with successful testicular sperm extraction had gynaecomastia compared to 31% of the men with failed testicular sperm extraction (NS). The mean testicular volume of the largest testis in patients with sperm found was 4.2 ml compared to 3.6 ml in patients with no sperm found (NS). The mean FSH and testosterone values in patients with sperm recovered were 31.2 IU/l and 3.1 ng/ml versus 40.4 IU/l (P = 0.04) and 3.2 ng/ml (NS) in patients without sperm recovered. All examined clinical and biological parameters failed to predict the outcome of the testicular sperm extraction using ROC curve analysis.
CONCLUSION: As in the general population of men with non-obstructive azoospermia, there are currently no clinical parameters predicting successful sperm retrieval in the subpopulation of patients with non-mosaic Klinefelter syndrome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15070870     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deh253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  22 in total

Review 1.  Surgical recovery of sperm in non-obstructive azoospermia.

Authors:  Tomomoto Ishikawa
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 3.285

2.  Reproductive outcomes in men with karyotype abnormalities: Case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Taylor P Kohn; Raul Clavijo; Ranjith Ramasamy; Tariq Hakky; Aravind Candrashekar; Dolores J Lamb; Larry I Lipshultz
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Spermatogenesis in Klinefelter syndrome.

Authors:  R Selice; A Di Mambro; A Garolla; V Ficarra; M Iafrate; A Ferlin; C Foresta
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 4.256

4.  Effects of clinical, laboratuary and pathological features on successful sperm retrieval in non-obstructive azoospermia.

Authors:  Çağrı Güneri; Turgut Alkibay; Lütfi Tunç
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2016-09

5.  Seven pregnancies and deliveries from non-mosaic Klinefelter syndrome patients using fresh and frozen testicular sperm.

Authors:  Koichi Kyono; Hirofumi Uto; Yukiko Nakajo; Shima Kumagai; Yasuhisa Araki; Satoru Kanto
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 6.  Consensus statement on diagnosis and clinical management of Klinefelter syndrome.

Authors:  A F Radicioni; A Ferlin; G Balercia; D Pasquali; L Vignozzi; M Maggi; C Foresta; A Lenzi
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 7.  [Fertility in patients with Klinefelter syndrome (47,XXY)].

Authors:  S Kliesch; M Zitzmann; H M Behre
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Association of a TDRD1 variant with spermatogenic failure susceptibility in the Han Chinese.

Authors:  Xiao-Bin Zhu; Jian-Qi Lu; Er-Lei Zhi; Yong Zhu; Sha-Sha Zou; Zi-Jue Zhu; Feng Zhang; Zheng Li
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 9.  Management of non-obstructive azoospermia.

Authors:  Koji Chiba; Noritoshi Enatsu; Masato Fujisawa
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2016-01-18

10.  Cytogenetic and Y chromosome microdeletion screening studies in infertile males with Oligozoospermia and Azoospermia in Southeast Turkey.

Authors:  M Balkan; S Tekes; A Gedik
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.