Literature DB >> 15070597

Adenocarcinoma of the duodenum: importance of accurate lymph node staging and similarity in outcome to gastric cancer.

Abeezar I Sarela1, Murray F Brennan, Martin S Karpeh, David Klimstra, Kevin C P Conlon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study examined prognostic discrimination by lymph node staging for duodenal adenocarcinoma and compared the nodal stage-specific survival with that associated with gastric antral adenocarcinoma.
METHOD: Prospectively maintained databases from 1983 to 2000 were reviewed to identify 137 patients with duodenal adenocarcinoma and 545 patients with gastric antral adenocarcinoma at a single institution.
RESULTS: R0 resection was performed for 72 patients with duodenal cancer. At least 15 lymph nodes were retrieved in 34 cases (47%). Lymph node metastasis (pN+) was detected in 31 patients (43%). With median follow-up of 36 months, the pN category was an independently significant prognostic factor (pN0, 5-year disease-specific survival of 83%, vs. pN+, 56%; P=.03). The survival difference between pN0 and pN+ was pronounced in patients with > or =15 nodes (100% vs. 47%, respectively; P=.01) but was lost in those with <15 nodes (75% vs. 64%; P=.5). For gastric antrum cancer, 331 patients had R0 resection, and > or =15 nodes were retrieved in 256 cases (77%). Lymph node metastasis was detected in 157 cases (47%). For patients with > or =15 nodes, 5-year survival with pN0 (87%) or pN+ (44%) was not significantly different from the corresponding categories for duodenal adenocarcinoma.
CONCLUSION: For duodenal adenocarcinoma, examination of > or =15 regional lymph nodes improved prognostic discrimination by the pN category. With accurate nodal staging, pN0 was associated with excellent prognosis. With pN+, prognosis was similar to that for gastric antral adenocarcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15070597     DOI: 10.1245/ASO.2004.05.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  23 in total

1.  Duodenal adenocarcinoma: clinicopathologic analysis and implications for treatment.

Authors:  George A Poultsides; Lyen C Huang; John L Cameron; Richard Tuli; Leslie Lan; Ralph H Hruban; Timothy M Pawlik; Joseph M Herman; Barish H Edil; Nita Ahuja; Michael A Choti; Christopher L Wolfgang; Richard D Schulick
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Superior prognostic importance of perineural invasion vs. lymph node involvement after curative resection of duodenal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Stefano Cecchini; Camilo Correa-Gallego; Vikram Desphande; Matteo Ligorio; Abdulmetin Dursun; Jennifer Wargo; Carlos Fernàndez-del Castillo; Andrew Louis Warshaw; Cristina Rosa Ferrone
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Postoperative morbidity is an additional prognostic factor after potentially curative pancreaticoduodenectomy for primary duodenal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Giuseppe Malleo; Alfredo Tonsi; Giovanni Marchegiani; Andrea Casarotto; Salvatore Paiella; Giovanni Butturini; Roberto Salvia; Claudio Bassi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 4.  Limited resection vs. pancreaticoduodenectomy for primary duodenal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pipit Burasakarn; Ryota Higuchi; Souya Nunobe; Shingo Kanaji; Hidetoshi Eguchi; Ken-Ichi Okada; Tsutomu Fujii; Yuichi Nagakawa; Kengo Kanetaka; Hiroharu Yamashita; Suguru Yamada; Shinji Kuroda; Toru Aoyama; Takahiro Akahori; Kenji Nakagawa; Masakazu Yamamoto; Hiroki Yamaue; Masayuki Sho; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Predictors of Survival in Ampullary, Bile Duct and Duodenal Cancers Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a 10-Year Multicentre Analysis.

Authors:  Stéphane Bourgouin; Jacques Ewald; Julien Mancini; Vincent Moutardier; Jean-Robert Delpero; Yves-Patrice Le Treut
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Prognostic factors for primary duodenal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Hyung Geun Lee; Dong Do You; Kwang Yeol Paik; Jin Seok Heo; Seong Ho Choi; Dong Wook Choi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  2564 resected periampullary adenocarcinomas at a single institution: trends over three decades.

Authors:  Jin He; Nita Ahuja; Martin A Makary; John L Cameron; Frederic E Eckhauser; Michael A Choti; Ralph H Hruban; Timothy M Pawlik; Christopher L Wolfgang
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 3.647

8.  Widespread lymph node recurrence of major duodenal papilla cancer following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Bai-Sen Li; Hui Shi; Min Wen; Ming-Yong Xiao; Jian Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Comparison of postoperative early and late complications between pancreas-sparing duodenectomy and pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Yusuke Nakayama; Masaru Konishi; Naoto Gotohda; Yuichiro Kato; Hidetoshi Aizawa; Masashi Kudo; Satoshi Okubo; Daigoro Takahashi; Yasunori Nishida; Kazuhiko Kitaguchi; Shinichiro Takahashi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 10.  Evaluation and management of periampullary tumors.

Authors:  William A Ross; Mike M Bismar
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2004-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.