Literature DB >> 22005894

Superior prognostic importance of perineural invasion vs. lymph node involvement after curative resection of duodenal adenocarcinoma.

Stefano Cecchini1, Camilo Correa-Gallego, Vikram Desphande, Matteo Ligorio, Abdulmetin Dursun, Jennifer Wargo, Carlos Fernàndez-del Castillo, Andrew Louis Warshaw, Cristina Rosa Ferrone.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Unlike other gastrointestinal tumors, lymph node involvement has not consistently been a negative prognostic factor for survival in patients with duodenal adenocarcinoma. Our aim is to examine prognostic factors in patients who underwent a curative resection of their duodenal adenocarcinoma.
METHODS: A retrospective review of 169 patients diagnosed with primary duodenal lesions between 1982 and 2010 was performed, of whom 103 were treated with curative intent. Clinico-pathologic factors were evaluated.
RESULTS: A potentially curative resection was performed in 103 patients with a median age of 67 years (range, 22-91). Perineural and lympho-vascular invasion were identified in 30 (29.1%) and 39 patients (37.9%), respectively. Median follow-up was 26.5 months. The 5-year overall survival was 62% vs. 25% for patients with or without nodal metastases (p < 0.001) and 56% vs. 19% for patients with or without perineural invasion (p < 0.001), respectively. Lymph node ratio, type of resection, and size of tumor failed to stratify prognosis. By multivariate analysis, perineural invasion was the most powerful independent predictor of survival (HR, 2.520; CI, 1.361-4.664).
CONCLUSIONS: Perineural invasion is a stronger predictor for recurrence and survival than tumor size, depth of infiltration, lymph node involvement, and type of resection in patients with duodenal adenocarcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22005894     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-011-1704-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  30 in total

Review 1.  Molecular mechanisms of axon guidance.

Authors:  John K Chilton
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2006-02-14       Impact factor: 3.582

Review 2.  Factors affecting distant disease-free survival for primary invasive breast cancer: use of a log-normal survival model.

Authors:  D R McCready; J A Chapman; W M Hanna; H J Kahn; D Murray; E B Fish; M E Trudeau; I L Andrulis; H L Lickley
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Factors influencing survival after resection for periampullary neoplasms.

Authors:  M Bouvet; R A Gamagami; E A Gilpin; O Romeo; A Sasson; D W Easter; A R Moossa
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Prognostic factors for primary duodenal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Hyung Geun Lee; Dong Do You; Kwang Yeol Paik; Jin Seok Heo; Seong Ho Choi; Dong Wook Choi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Results of pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with periampullary adenocarcinoma: perineural growth more important prognostic factor than tumor localization.

Authors:  Margijske H G van Roest; Annette S H Gouw; Paul M J G Peeters; Robert J Porte; Maarten J H Slooff; Vaclav Fidler; Koert P de Jong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Improved survival for adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater: fifty-five consecutive resections.

Authors:  John P Duffy; Oscar J Hines; Jerome H Liu; Clifford Y Ko; Galen Cortina; William H Isacoff; Henry Nguyen; Michael Leonardi; Ronald K Tompkins; Howard A Reber
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2003-09

7.  Growth and survival mechanisms associated with perineural invasion in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Gustavo E Ayala; Hong Dai; Michael Ittmann; Rile Li; Michael Powell; Anna Frolov; Thomas M Wheeler; Timothy C Thompson; David Rowley
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 8.  Perineural invasion in cancer: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Catherine Liebig; Gustavo Ayala; Jonathan A Wilks; David H Berger; Daniel Albo
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Periampullary adenocarcinoma: analysis of 5-year survivors.

Authors:  C J Yeo; T A Sohn; J L Cameron; R H Hruban; K D Lillemoe; H A Pitt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Perineural invasion of carcinoma of the pancreas and biliary tract.

Authors:  T Nagakawa; K Mori; T Nakano; M Kadoya; H Kobayashi; T Akiyama; M Kayahara; T Ohta; K Ueno; Y Higashino
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  17 in total

1.  Prostate biopsy perineural invasion is not independently associated with positive surgical margins following radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Benjamin T Ristau; Jeffrey J Tomaszewski; Yi-Fan Chen; Marnie Bertolet; Elen Woldemichael; Joel B Nelson
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Postoperative morbidity is an additional prognostic factor after potentially curative pancreaticoduodenectomy for primary duodenal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Giuseppe Malleo; Alfredo Tonsi; Giovanni Marchegiani; Andrea Casarotto; Salvatore Paiella; Giovanni Butturini; Roberto Salvia; Claudio Bassi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 3.  Limited resection vs. pancreaticoduodenectomy for primary duodenal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pipit Burasakarn; Ryota Higuchi; Souya Nunobe; Shingo Kanaji; Hidetoshi Eguchi; Ken-Ichi Okada; Tsutomu Fujii; Yuichi Nagakawa; Kengo Kanetaka; Hiroharu Yamashita; Suguru Yamada; Shinji Kuroda; Toru Aoyama; Takahiro Akahori; Kenji Nakagawa; Masakazu Yamamoto; Hiroki Yamaue; Masayuki Sho; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Widespread lymph node recurrence of major duodenal papilla cancer following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Bai-Sen Li; Hui Shi; Min Wen; Ming-Yong Xiao; Jian Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Duodenal adenocarcinoma: Advances in diagnosis and surgical management.

Authors:  Jordan M Cloyd; Elizabeth George; Brendan C Visser
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-03-27

6.  Intraluminal superior vena cava metastasis from adenosquamous carcinoma of the duodenum: A case report.

Authors:  Kotoe Takayoshi; Hiroshi Ariyama; Shingo Tamura; Shunsuke Yoda; Takeshi Arita; Toshihiro Yamaguchi; Keigo Ozono; Hidetaka Yamamoto; Kyoko Inadomi; Hozumi Kumagai; Mamoru Tanaka; Yuta Okumura; Kosuke Sagara; Kenta Nio; Michitaka Nakano; Shuji Arita; Hitoshi Kusaba; Keita Odashiro; Yoshinao Oda; Koichi Akashi; Eishi Baba
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  Methylation of MGMT Is Associated with Poor Prognosis in Patients with Stage III Duodenal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Tao Fu; Anup Sharmab; Fei Xie; Yanliang Liu; Kai Li; Weiwei Wan; Stephen B Baylin; Christopher L Wolfgang; Nita Ahuja
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Prognostic Factors and Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Primary Duodenal Adenocarcinoma: A Single-Center Experience from China.

Authors:  Qing-Long Jiang; Xiang-Hui Huang; Ying-Tai Chen; Jian-Wei Zhang; Cheng-Feng Wang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  The Association between Survival and the Pathologic Features of Periampullary Tumors Varies over Time.

Authors:  Jennifer K Plichta; Anjali S Godambe; Zachary Fridirici; Sherri Yong; James M Sinacore; Gerard J Abood; Gerard V Aranha
Journal:  HPB Surg       Date:  2014-07-01

10.  Elevated baseline serum lactate dehydrogenase indicates a poor prognosis in primary duodenum adenocarcinoma patients.

Authors:  Zhan-Hong Chen; Miao-Zhen Qiu; Xiang-Yuan Wu; Qi-Nian Wu; Jia-Huan Lu; Zhao-Lei Zeng; Yun Wang; Xiao-Li Wei; Feng Wang; Rui-Hua Xu
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 4.207

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.