Literature DB >> 15068384

The sensitivity of PCR detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts in fecal samples using two DNA extraction methods.

Gabriella Lindergard1, Daryl V Nydam, Susan E Wade, Stephanie L Schaaf, Hussni O Mohammed.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The implementation of cost-effective intervention strategies for zoonotic protozoa relies on the development of sensitive and accurate diagnostic methods. We carried out a study to evaluate the accuracy of a PCR method for the detection of Cryptosporidium spp. oocysts in fecal samples from cattle.
METHODS: Fecal samples were spiked with different numbers of oocysts and the limit of detection of the method was determined. Two methods of DNA extraction were assessed: glass beads and freeze-thawing using liquid nitrogen. A nested PCR approach was developed targeting the Cryptosporidium SSU rRNA and TRAP-C2 genes. Agreement between the diagnosis of Cryptosporidium spp. at the SSU rRNA and TRAP-C2 loci was quantified using the kappa-coefficient.
RESULTS: Compared with the freeze-thawing method, the glass beads method was found to be a better way of extracting DNA from Cryptosporidium oocysts (sensitivities were 83 and 100%, respectively). The limits of detection for glass beads and freeze-thaw were low, 1 and 10 oocyst/g fecal samples, respectively. Forty-six percent of the field samples previously classified as negative for Cryptosporidium parvum by the flotation-concentration and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay methods showed DNA with the PCR protocol.
CONCLUSION: Primers for SSU rRNA are more successful in producing an amplification than primers for the TRAP-C2 gene which makes the former PCR protocol the approach of choice for detecting Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in field samples.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 15068384     DOI: 10.1007/bf03260031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1084-8592


  26 in total

1.  Prevalence of Giardia sp. Cryptosporidium parvum and Cryptosporidium andersoni (syn. C. muris) [correction of Cryptosporidium parvum and Cryptosporidium muris (C. andersoni)] in 109 dairy herds in five counties of southeastern New York.

Authors:  S E Wade; H O Mohammed; S L Schaaf
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 2.738

2.  An enzyme immunoassay for detecting Cryptosporidium in faecal and environmental samples.

Authors:  P A Chapman; B A Rush; J McLauchlin
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 2.472

3.  Multiple sequence alignment with hierarchical clustering.

Authors:  F Corpet
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1988-11-25       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  PCR detection of cryptosporidium: the way forward?

Authors:  U M Morgan; R C Thompson
Journal:  Parasitol Today       Date:  1998-12

Review 5.  Prevalence, detection and control of Cryptosporidium parvum in food.

Authors:  I Laberge; M W Griffiths; M W Griffiths
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.277

6.  Detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts in soil samples by enzyme-linked immunoassay.

Authors:  G Lindergard; S E Wade; S Schaaf; R S Barwick; H O Mohammed
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 2.738

7.  Parameters affecting polymerase chain reaction detection of waterborne Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts.

Authors:  S D Sluter; S Tzipori; G Widmer
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Molecular epidemiological analysis of Cryptosporidium spp. in the United Kingdom: results of genotyping Cryptosporidium spp. in 1,705 fecal samples from humans and 105 fecal samples from livestock animals.

Authors:  J McLauchlin; C Amar; S Pedraza-Díaz; G L Nichols
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Infection pattern of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in calves.

Authors:  L Xiao; R P Herd
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.738

10.  Development of a PCR protocol for sensitive detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts in water samples.

Authors:  D W Johnson; N J Pieniazek; D W Griffin; L Misener; J B Rose
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  2 in total

1.  First Epidemiological Report on the Prevalence and Associated Risk Factors of Cryptosporidium spp. in Farmed Marine and Wild Freshwater Fish in Central and Eastern of Algeria.

Authors:  Nassiba Reghaissia; Sadiya Maxamhud; AbdElkarim Laatamna; Houssem Samari; AbdEldjalil Dahmane; Rabeh Berima; Amine Abdelli; Ahcene Hakem; Djamel Baroudi; Anastasios D Tsaousis
Journal:  Acta Parasitol       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 1.534

Review 2.  Emerging pathogens: challenges and successes of molecular diagnostics.

Authors:  Jianli Dong; Juan P Olano; Jere W McBride; David H Walker
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 5.568

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.