Literature DB >> 15065030

Which children could benefit from additional diagnostic tools in case of suspected appendicitis?

W T van den Broek1, E D van der Ende, A B Bijnen, P J Breslau, D J Gouma.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: New diagnostic tools such as ultrasound scan, computed tomography (CT) scan, and diagnostic laparoscopy, have become available for children with suspected appendicitis but should be reserved for equivocal cases. The aim of this study was to develop a scoring system to identify this subgroup of children.
METHODS: Patients from 2 different periods (period 1, 99 consecutive children [group 1] and period 2, 62 consecutive children [group 2] with suspected appendicitis) were prospectively evaluated. Variables predicting appendicitis were obtained from group 1. By means of a regression analysis, a scoring system was created and applied to the patients of group 2. Missed appendicitis and negative appendectomy rates obtained by clinical practice were compared with the results that would have been accomplished based on the scoring system. Thereafter, the scoring system was externally validated in a group of children presented at another hospital (group 3, n = 114).
RESULTS: The variables, leukocyte count > or = 10.10(9)/L (2 points); rebound tenderness (2 points); and temperature > or = 38 degrees C (1 point) correlated significantly with appendicitis. The scoring system was used to categorize patients into 3 groups: appendicitis unlikely, doubtful appendicitis, and suspected appendicitis. The specificity and sensitivity of the scoring system were, respectively, 85% and 89%. Applying the scoring system would lead to comparable negative appendectomy rates of 8% versus 6% using clinical judgement and a comparable number of performed laparoscopies (26% v 31%). However, it could lead to a lower missed appendicitis rate (1% v 6%) and a lower perforation rate (0% v 11%). External validation showed comparable performed laparoscopies (32%) and missed appendicitis (2%) rates but a higher negative appendectomy rate (19%), probably owing to a lower percentage of appendicitis in hospital (2, 47%) compared with hospital (1, 71%).
CONCLUSIONS: Children can be observed if leukocyte count is less than 10.10(9)/L and rebound tenderness is absent; a diagnostic laparoscopy should be performed if one of these is present, and if both are present one could perform an appendectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15065030     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2003.12.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  10 in total

1.  Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), 2006-2008.

Authors:  Hossein Masoomi; Steven Mills; Matthew O Dolich; Noor Ketana; Joseph C Carmichael; Ninh T Nguyen; Michael J Stamos
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  The role of imaging in children with suspected appendicitis: the UK perspective.

Authors:  Anthony Lander
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-11-11

Review 3.  Does this child have appendicitis?

Authors:  David G Bundy; Julie S Byerley; E Allen Liles; Eliana M Perrin; Jessica Katznelson; Henry E Rice
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Validation and refinement of a prediction rule to identify children at low risk for acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Anupam B Kharbanda; Nanette C Dudley; Lalit Bajaj; Michelle D Stevenson; Charles G Macias; Manoj K Mittal; Richard G Bachur; Jonathan E Bennett; Kelly Sinclair; Craig Huang; Peter S Dayan
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2012-08

5.  Utility of CT after sonography for suspected appendicitis in children: integration of a clinical scoring system with a staged imaging protocol.

Authors:  Abhay Srinivasan; Sabah Servaes; Andrès Peña; Kassa Darge
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2014-06-12

6.  Use and accuracy of diagnostic imaging by hospital type in pediatric appendicitis.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Saito; Yan Yan; Thomas W Evashwick; Brad W Warner; Phillip I Tarr
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-12-24       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Ultrasonography aids decision-making in children with abdominal pain.

Authors:  S Scammell; N Lansdale; A Sprigg; D Campbell; S Marven
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.951

8.  Retrospective Multivariate Analysis of Data from Children with Suspected Appendicitis: A New Tool for Diagnosis.

Authors:  Zafer Dokumcu; Bade Toker Kurtmen; Emre Divarci; Petek Bayindir Tamay; Timur Kose; Murat Sezak; Geylani Ozok; Orkan Ergun; Ahmet Celik
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 1.112

9.  Laboratory Markers in the Prediction of Acute Perforated Appendicitis in Children.

Authors:  Jing Yang; Chong Liu; Yuxia He; Zhangqiao Cai
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 1.112

10.  Bedside ultrasonography as an adjunct to routine evaluation of acute appendicitis in the emergency department.

Authors:  Samuel H F Lam; Anthony Grippo; Chistopher Kerwin; P John Konicki; Diana Goodwine; Michael J Lambert
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2014-09-18
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.