Literature DB >> 15063569

In vivo electroporation of skeletal muscles increases the efficacy of Japanese encephalitis virus DNA vaccine.

Chang-Jer Wu1, Shan-Chih Lee, Hui-Wen Huang, Mi-Hua Tao.   

Abstract

DNA vaccines can induce protective immunity against subsequent viral challenge. However, for some DNA vaccines to be effective when administered intramuscularly, cardiotoxin pretreatment is necessary. In this study, we used the technique of in vivo electroporation to facilitate DNA delivery and elicit an immune response without the use of cardiotoxin. Intramuscular delivery of DNA (pE) encoding the Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) envelope protein-induced anti-E antibodies only when the injected muscles were pretreated with cardiotoxin. In vivo electrotransfer of pE eliminated the need for cardiotoxin pretreatment and produced higher antibody titer than that induced by conventional intramuscular injection. Moreover, the induced immunity also conferred protection against lethal viral challenge. Interestingly, like intramuscular immunization, in vivo electroporation immunization with plasmid pE generated anti-envelope antibodies that were predominantly of the immunoglobulin G2a (IgG2a) isotype. These results suggest that in vivo electroporation can be used as an efficient gene delivery system for DNA vaccines to provide efficient protection against viral infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15063569     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2003.10.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  8 in total

1.  The efficacy of DNA vaccination is enhanced in mice by targeting the encoded protein to dendritic cells.

Authors:  Godwin Nchinda; Janelle Kuroiwa; Margarita Oks; Christine Trumpfheller; Chae Gyu Park; Yaoxing Huang; Drew Hannaman; Sarah J Schlesinger; Olga Mizenina; Michel C Nussenzweig; Klaus Uberla; Ralph M Steinman
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  An optimized, synthetic DNA vaccine encoding the toxin A and toxin B receptor binding domains of Clostridium difficile induces protective antibody responses in vivo.

Authors:  Scott M Baliban; Amanda Michael; Berje Shammassian; Shikata Mudakha; Amir S Khan; Simon Cocklin; Isaac Zentner; Brian P Latimer; Laurent Bouillaut; Meredith Hunter; Preston Marx; Niranjan Y Sardesai; Seth L Welles; Jeffrey M Jacobson; David B Weiner; Michele A Kutzler
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 3.441

3.  Numerical optimization of gene electrotransfer into muscle tissue.

Authors:  Anze Zupanic; Selma Corovic; Damijan Miklavcic; Mojca Pavlin
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 4.  DNA vaccines: ready for prime time?

Authors:  Michele A Kutzler; David B Weiner
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 5.  Electroporation advances in large animals.

Authors:  Scott D Reed; Shulin Li
Journal:  Curr Gene Ther       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.391

6.  Evaluation of a novel non-penetrating electrode for use in DNA vaccination.

Authors:  Amy Donate; Domenico Coppola; Yolmari Cruz; Richard Heller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Fas ligand DNA enhances a vaccination effect by coadministered DNA encoding a tumor antigen through augmenting production of antibody against the tumor antigen.

Authors:  Boya Zhong; Guangyu Ma; Ayako Sato; Osamu Shimozato; Hongdan Liu; Quanhai Li; Masato Shingyoji; Yuji Tada; Koichiro Tatsumi; Hideaki Shimada; Kenzo Hiroshima; Masatoshi Tagawa
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 4.818

8.  DNA-vaccination via tattooing induces stronger humoral and cellular immune responses than intramuscular delivery supported by molecular adjuvants.

Authors:  Dana Pokorna; Ivonne Rubio; Martin Müller
Journal:  Genet Vaccines Ther       Date:  2008-02-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.