Literature DB >> 15062889

Effects of the angiotensin II receptor blockers telmisartan versus valsartan on the circadian variation of blood pressure: impact on the early morning period.

William B White1, Yves Lacourciere, Giora Davidai.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring has shown that BP typically declines by 10% to 20% during sleep and increases fairly rapidly in the early morning period. Because the early morning period has been associated with both loss of hypertension control and increased rates of myocardial infarction and stroke, there has been interest in evaluating the effects of antihypertensive therapy at this particular time of the day. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of a long half-life (telmisartan, 24 h) versus intermediate half-life (valsartan, 6 to 9 h) on early morning BP in two scenarios: after an active dose and after a missed dose of each agent.
METHODS: The study was a double-blind, randomized trial that compared telmisartan (40 to 80 mg once daily) versus valsartan (80 to 160 mg once daily) on early morning BP in 490 patients with hypertension. Ambulatory BP recordings were performed at baseline after a placebo period and again after 6 and 8 weeks of double-blind therapy in a randomized cross-over design. The monitoring patients received either an active dose or a placebo dose (to mimic a "missed" dose). The primary study end point was reduction in the BP in the early morning period (last 6 h of the dosing period).
RESULTS: After the active dose, telmisartan reduced the BP during the last 6 h of the dosing period by -11/-7.6 +/- 0.8/0.6 mm Hg compared to -8.7/-5.8 +/- 0.8/0.6 mm Hg on valsartan (P = .02 for systolic BP and.01 for diastolic BP). On the day of the missed dose, telmisartan reduced the early morning BP by -9.0/-6.3 +/- 0.7/0.6 mm Hg versus -7.4/-5.1 +/- 0.7/0.4 mm Hg on valsartan (P = .09 for systolic BP and.06 for diastolic BP). On the day of the missed dose, reductions in 24-h average BP for the two antihypertensive agents were -10.3/-6.9 mm Hg for telmisartan versus -8.7/-5.9 mm Hg for valsartan (P = .06 for systolic BP and.056 for diastolic BP).
CONCLUSIONS: On a day of active therapy, telmisartan lowered both systolic and diastolic BP to a greater extent than valsartan for the last 6 h of the dosing interval. On a day in which a dose was missed, there was a notable trend for greater BP reduction during the latter part of the dosing interval on telmisartan versus valsartan. These results demonstrate that telmisartan achieved a greater effect than valsartan on BP during the early morning period in patients with hypertension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15062889     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2004.02.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hypertens        ISSN: 0895-7061            Impact factor:   2.689


  28 in total

Review 1.  Telmisartan: a review of its use in the management of hypertension.

Authors:  Anna J Battershill; Lesley J Scott
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Guiding antihypertensive treatment decisions using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Authors:  Giuseppe Mancia; Gianfranco Parati
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 3.  Blood pressure variability: its measurement and significance in hypertension.

Authors:  Gianfranco Parati; Andrea Faini; Mariaconsuelo Valentini
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 4.  Is it possible to manage hypertension and evaluate therapy without ambulatory blood pressure monitoring?

Authors:  William B White; Spyridoula Maraka
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.369

5.  Treatment with telmisartan, a long-acting angiotensin II receptor blocker, prevents migraine attacks in Japanese non-responders to lomerizine.

Authors:  Ken Ikeda; Sayori Hanashiro; Yuichi Ishikawa; Masahiro Sawada; Maya Kyuzen; Harumi Morioka; Junya Ebina; Junpei Nagasawa; Masaru Yanagihashi; Ken Miura; Takehisa Hirayama; Takanori Takazawa; Osamu Kano; Kiyokazu Kawabe; Yasuo Iwasaki
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 3.307

6.  Molecular characterisation of the interactions between olmesartan and telmisartan and the human angiotensin II AT1 receptor.

Authors:  M T Le; M K Pugsley; G Vauquelin; I Van Liefde
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 7.  New standards in hypertension and cardiovascular risk management: focus on telmisartan.

Authors:  Domenico Galzerano; Cristina Capogrosso; Sara Di Michele; Antonio Galzerano; Paola Paparello; Diana Lama; Carlo Gaudio
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2010-03-24

Review 8.  Antihypertensive efficacy of angiotensin receptor blockers as monotherapy as evaluated by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Harikrishna Makani; Sripal Bangalore; Azhar Supariwala; Jorge Romero; Edgar Argulian; Franz H Messerli
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  Updated meta-analytical approach to the efficacy of antihypertensive drugs in reducing blood pressure.

Authors:  J P Baguet; B Legallicier; P Auquier; S Robitail
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 10.  Comparison of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists in the treatment of essential hypertension.

Authors:  David H G Smith
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.