Literature DB >> 15062862

Navigating in a virtual three-dimensional maze: how do egocentric and allocentric reference frames interact?

Manuel Vidal1, Michel-Ange Amorim, Alain Berthoz.   

Abstract

Spatial navigation in the presence of gravity restricts one's displacement to two-dimensional (2D) planes. Therefore, self-motion only includes translations and yaw rotations. In contrast, in weightlessness, one can translate and turn in any direction. In the first experiment, we compared the ability to memorize a virtual three-dimensional (3D) maze after passive exploration in three self-motion conditions, each using a different set of rotations for turning. Subjects indicated which pathway they traversed among four successive corridors presented from an outside perspective. Results showed that exploring in the terrestrial condition (including only yaw rotations, the viewer's virtual body remaining upright) allowed better recognition of the corridor than in the weightless condition (which included pitch and yaw rotations according to the turns), particularly for more complex 3D structures. The more frequently the viewer-defined (egocentric) and the global environment (allocentric) verticals were aligned during exploration, the more easily subjects could memorize the 3D maze, suggesting that simplifying the relationship between the egocentric and allocentric reference frames facilitates spatial updating. Nevertheless, with practice, performance in the weightless condition improved whereas in the natural terrestrial condition performance remained at its initial maximum, indicating that the cognitive processes involved were innate for this particular condition. The second experiment revealed that single rotations in the terrestrial condition must be performed around the body axis in order to obtain optimal spatial updating performance, and that the latter is independent of the conflict with gravity that might favor this condition when one is actually upright. This suggests that although humans can memorize 3D-structured environments their innate neurocognitive functions appear to be specialized for natural 2D navigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15062862     DOI: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res        ISSN: 0926-6410


  12 in total

1.  Motor sequence consolidation: constrained by critical time windows or competing components.

Authors:  Daniel A Cohen; Edwin M Robertson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The timing of temporoparietal and frontal activations during mental own body transformations from different visuospatial perspectives.

Authors:  Lars Schwabe; Bigna Lenggenhager; Olaf Blanke
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  MPI CyberMotion Simulator: implementation of a novel motion simulator to investigate multisensory path integration in three dimensions.

Authors:  Michael Barnett-Cowan; Tobias Meilinger; Manuel Vidal; Harald Teufel; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Riemannian classification of single-trial surface EEG and sources during checkerboard and navigational images in humans.

Authors:  Cédric Simar; Robin Petit; Nichita Bozga; Axelle Leroy; Ana-Maria Cebolla; Mathieu Petieau; Gianluca Bontempi; Guy Cheron
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Storing upright turns: how visual and vestibular cues interact during the encoding and recalling process.

Authors:  Manuel Vidal; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Directional learning, but no spatial mapping by rats performing a navigational task in an inverted orientation.

Authors:  Stephane Valerio; Benjamin J Clark; Jeremy H M Chan; Carlton P Frost; Mark J Harris; Jeffrey S Taube
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 2.877

7.  Different strategies for spatial updating in yaw and pitch path integration.

Authors:  Caspar M Goeke; Peter König; Klaus Gramann
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.558

8.  Virtual reality as a tool for evaluation of repetitive rhythmic movements in the elderly and Parkinson's disease patients.

Authors:  Pablo Arias; Verónica Robles-García; Gabriel Sanmartín; Julian Flores; Javier Cudeiro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Short-term EEG dynamics and neural generators evoked by navigational images.

Authors:  Axelle Leroy; Carlos Cevallos; Ana-Maria Cebolla; Stéphanie Caharel; Bernard Dan; Guy Cheron
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A modular theory of multisensory integration for motor control.

Authors:  Michele Tagliabue; Joseph McIntyre
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.