Literature DB >> 15061473

Adjustment of dry weight in hemodialysis patients using intradialytic continuous multifrequency bioimpedance of the calf.

F Zhu1, M K Kuhlmann, S Sarkar, C Kaitwatcharachai, R Khilnani, E F Leonard, R Greenwood, N W Levin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current concepts of dry weight (DW) prescription are largely based on clinical symptoms because of the difficulty in assessing extracellular fluid volume (ECV) during dialysis. Intradialytic changes in ECV can be recorded as changes in extracellular resistance [Re] by continuous regional calf multifrequency bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS). We hypothesized that relative changes in calf Re (Re at time '0' over Re at time 't' [R(e-0)/R(e-t)]) will become very small when ECV is reduced towards normal and individual dry weight is reached.
METHOD: Intradialytic continuous calf BIS was recorded repeatedly in 15 hemodialysis (HD) patients. The first measurement was performed at the prevailing clinical dry weight (CDW). Next measurements were made after post-HD body weight was gradually decreased by 0.2-0.3 kg per treatment. This procedure was iterated over several subsequent treatments until a treatment was observed where changes in R(e-0)/R(e-t) were < 1%. The weight at the end of this treatment was defined as "achieved dry weight (ADW)". Each R(e-0)/R(e-t) curve was fitted using a Matlab program (curve fitting toolbox) to obtain the exact weight at 20 min after beginning of the flattening of the R(e-0)/R(e-t) slope ('dry' weight estimated from BIS, DW-BIS).
RESULTS: Both mean ADW (80.5 +/- 34.1 kg) and mean DW-BIS (80.6 +/- 34.1) were significantly lower than CDW (81.4 +/- 32.0 kg, p < 0.001), but there was no difference between ADW and DW-BIS. However, the average weight reduction from CDW to ADW (0.80 +/- 0.15 kg) was significantly higher than from CDW to DW-BIS (0.66 +/- 0.14 kg, p < 0.001, paired t-test). When ADW was achieved, pre-dialysis systolic blood pressure (SBP) was lower than at CDW (139.3 +/- 32.5 mmHg, vs. 129.4 +/- 33 mmHg, p < 0.05), post-HD SBP did not differ. The incidence of clinical symptoms of underhydration was similar at CDW (15%) and DW-BIS (15%), but higher at ADW (46%).
CONCLUSION: Intradialytic continuous calf BIS allows the assessment of changes in extracellular calf resistance as an indicator of changes in extracellular fluid volume. Recording of a continuous R(e-0)/R(e-t) slope during dialysis appears to be a promising new tool for the prediction of dry weight in hemodialysis patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15061473     DOI: 10.1177/039139880402700205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Artif Organs        ISSN: 0391-3988            Impact factor:   1.595


  9 in total

1.  The association between arterial stiffness and fluid status in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Ismail Kocyigit; Murat Hayri Sipahioglu; Ozcan Orscelik; Aydin Unal; Ahmet Celik; Samer R Abbas; Fansan Zhu; Bulent Tokgoz; Ali Dogan; Oktay Oymak; Peter Kotanko; Nathan W Levin
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  Water removal from the legs does explain hypotension in short daily hemodialysis.

Authors:  A M Bales; L C Battaini; L L Nardotto; R S Humel; B C Silva; R M A Moyses; M C M Castro; R M Elias
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Extracellular fluid management and hypertension in urban dwelling versus rural dwelling hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Marcello Tonelli; Anita Lloyd; Neesh Pannu; Scott Klarenbach; Pietro Ravani; Kailash Jindal; Jennifer MacRae; Larry Unsworth; Braden Manns; Brenda Hemmelgarn
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.902

4.  A Randomized Crossover Trial of Dietary Sodium Restriction in Stage 3-4 CKD.

Authors:  Rajiv Saran; Robin L Padilla; Brenda W Gillespie; Michael Heung; Scott L Hummel; Vimal Kumar Derebail; Bertram Pitt; Nathan W Levin; Fansan Zhu; Samer R Abbas; Li Liu; Peter Kotanko; Philip Klemmer
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 8.237

5.  Probing the dry weight by bioimpedance: the resistance stabilization test.

Authors:  Carlo Basile; Pasquale Libutti; Piero Lisi; Luigi Rossi; Carlo Lomonte
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 3.902

6.  Association between muscle hydration measures acquired using bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy and magnetic resonance imaging in healthy and hemodialysis population.

Authors:  Anuradha Sawant; Andrew A House; Bert M Chesworth; Denise M Connelly; Robert Lindsay; Joe Gati; Robert Bartha; Tom J Overend
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2015-01-27

7.  Knee-to-knee Bioimpedance Measurements to Monitor Changes in Extracellular Fluid in Haemodynamic-unstable Patients During Dialysis.

Authors:  Abdul Hamid Ismail; Georg Schlieper; Marian Walter; Jürgen Floege; Steffen Leonhardt
Journal:  J Electr Bioimpedance       Date:  2019-08-20

8.  Sarcopenia assessed by 4-step EWGSOP2 in elderly hemodialysis patients: Feasibility and limitations.

Authors:  M Luz Sánchez-Tocino; Blanca Miranda-Serrano; Carolina Gracia-Iguacel; Ana María de-Alba-Peñaranda; Sebastian Mas-Fontao; Antonio López-González; Silvia Villoria-González; Mónica Pereira-García; Alberto Ortíz; Emilio González-Parra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Clinical usefulness of bioimpedance analysis for assessing volume status in patients receiving maintenance dialysis.

Authors:  Jung Hwan Park; Young-Il Jo; Jong-Ho Lee
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 2.884

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.