| Literature DB >> 15061383 |
Jean-Marie Boeynaems1, Anne De Leener, Barbara Dessars, Hector Rodriguez Villa-Lobos, Jean-Claude Aubry, Frédéric Cotton, Philippe Thiry.
Abstract
Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) tubes have several advantages over glass tubes: they are unbreakable, lighter and more easily disposed of. Despite a steady increase in their use and an expansion of the range of available tubes, few studies validating their use have been published in the literature. This paper describes the various studies that have been performed to compare VENOJECT glass, VENOSAFE PET and VENOSAFE PET/heparin tubes for the assay of a panel of analytes in routine clinical chemistry, immunochemistry, hormone and tumor marker analysis and trace metal determination. These studies demonstrate that VENOSAFE PET tubes are a suitable alternative to glass tubes.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2004 PMID: 15061383 DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2004.013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Chem Lab Med ISSN: 1434-6621 Impact factor: 3.694