Literature DB >> 15060521

Epidural metastatic spinal cord compression: functional outcome and survival after inpatient rehabilitation.

I E Eriks1, E L D Angenot, G J Lankhorst.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective descriptive study.
OBJECTIVES: (1). To obtain an overall appraisal of patients with epidural metastatic spinal cord compression (SCC) admitted to nine Dutch spinal cord units (SCUs) between 01-01-1990 and 01-01-2000. (2). To identify factors that predict survival >1 year after in-patient rehabilitation of patients with epidural metastatic SCC.
SETTING: Dutch SCUs. Rehabilitation Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam. Rehabilitation Center Heliomare, Wijk aan Zee. Rehabilitation Center De Hoogstraat, Utrecht. Rehabilitation Center Rijndam, Rotterdam. Rehabilitation Center Sophia Stichting, Den Haag. Rehabilitation Center Beatrixoord, Haren. Rehabilitation Center Het Roessingh, Enschede. Rehabilitation Center Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen. Rehabilitation Center SRL Hoensbroeck, Hoensbroek.
METHODS: (1). Clinical records were reviewed and demographic, clinical and functional data were collected according to a protocol. The date of admittance to the SCU, rehabilitation goals, date of discharge and date of death were recorded. (2). The odds ratio (OR) was calculated for all determinants on admittance to the SCU in order to find indicators that predict survival >1 year after discharge from the SCU. An OR >or=2 was considered to be clinically significant.
RESULTS: In total, 131 patients with epidural metastatic SCC were admitted. In all, 117 clinical records were retrieved and 97 clinical records provided complete data. The average age on admittance was 58 years. Among the patients 53% were male. The average Barthel score on admittance was 7.2/20 points. The average length of stay in the SCU was 104 days (3-336). Overall, 66% of the patients were discharged. The average Barthel score on discharge was 12.0 points. The average survival after discharge was 808 (0-3669) days. During their stay on the SCU, seven patients died. At 1 year after discharge, 52% of the patients were still alive. These patients suffered less complications, had been admitted less often to a hospital during rehabilitation, had made better functional progress and had been discharged home more often. A survival >1 year after discharge is related to ASIA D (OR 4.3), MRC 4 and 5 (OR 5.4), tumour in remission (OR 3.8) and independence or partial independence on the Barthel items: dressing (OR 4.3) and making transfers (OR 5.0).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with epidural metastatic SCC may benefit from in-patient rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15060521     DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101555

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  11 in total

Review 1.  Rehabilitation and treatment of spinal cord tumors.

Authors:  Vishwa S Raj; Latanya Lofton
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 2.  Rehabilitation of people with spinal cord damage due to tumor: literature review, international survey and practical recommendations for optimizing their rehabilitation.

Authors:  Peter Wayne New; Ruth Marshall; Michael D Stubblefield; Giorgio Scivoletto
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 1.985

3.  Cancer rehabilitation: a barometer for survival?

Authors:  Takako Saotome; Linda Klein; Steven Faux
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Spinal cord injury caused by epidural B-cell lymphoma: report of two cases.

Authors:  Anthony Chiodo
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.985

5.  Factors predictive of survival and estimated years of life lost in the decade following nontraumatic and traumatic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  B B Hatch; C M Wood-Wentz; T M Therneau; M G Walker; J M Payne; R K Reeves
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 2.772

6.  Inpatient rehabilitation outcomes in patients with malignant spinal cord compression compared to other non-traumatic spinal cord injury: A population based study.

Authors:  Christian D Fortin; Jennifer Voth; Susan B Jaglal; B Catharine Craven
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 7.  Important Clinical Rehabilitation Principles Unique to People with Non-traumatic Spinal Cord Dysfunction.

Authors:  Peter Wayne New; Inge Eriks-Hoogland; Giorgio Scivoletto; Ronald K Reeves; Andrea Townson; Ruth Marshall; Farooq A Rathore
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2017

8.  Inpatient rehabilitation outcomes in neoplastic spinal cord compression vs. traumatic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Sevgi Ikbali Afsar; Sacide Nur Saraçgil Cosar; Oya Umit Yemişçi; Hüma Bölük
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 1.985

9.  Spinal Cord Injury due to Tumour or Metastasis in Aragón, Northeastern Spain (1991-2008): Incidence, Time Trends, and Neurological Function.

Authors:  Maayken Elizabeth Louise van den Berg; Juan M Castellote; Jose Ignacio Mayordomo; Ignacio Mahillo-Fernandez; Jesus de Pedro-Cuesta
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Clinical outcome of surgical management for symptomatic metastatic spinal cord compression from prostate cancer.

Authors:  Yasuhide Miyoshi; Takashi Kawahara; Masahiro Yao; Hiroji Uemura
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2020-09-05       Impact factor: 2.264

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.