Literature DB >> 32701391

Inpatient rehabilitation outcomes in neoplastic spinal cord compression vs. traumatic spinal cord injury.

Sevgi Ikbali Afsar1, Sacide Nur Saraçgil Cosar1, Oya Umit Yemişçi1, Hüma Bölük1.   

Abstract

Objective: To compare neurological and functional outcomes, and complications of patients with neoplastic vs traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) after in-patient rehabilitation.Design: This study is a retrospective analysis.Setting: In-patient rehabilitation unit of a tertiary research hospital.Participants: A total of 252 patients with a SCI were included; 43 with neoplastic SCI (mean age: 60.9 ± 15.7 years, 60.5% were males) and 209 with traumatic SCI (mean age: 43.1 ± 16.8 years, 71.3% were males).Outcome measures: Comparisons were made of demographic characteristics, etiology, American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale, functional independence measurement (FIM) and Functional Ambulation Categories (FAC) scores, length of stay (LOS), bladder independence, medical comorbidities and complications in both groups.
Results: Patients with neoplastic SCI were significantly older than those with traumatic SCI (P < 0.01). No difference was present between the groups in terms of sex and lesion level (P > 0.05). Incomplete SCI was significantly higher in the neoplastic group when compared with the traumatic group (P < 0.01). The LOS was significantly shorter in the neoplastic group than traumatic group (34.8 ± 41.03 vs. 60.02 ± 53.1, P < 0.01). There were no differences in the admission FIM scores (69.3 ± 24.7 vs. 58.7 ± 18.9, P > 0.05), discharge FIM scores (82.1 ± 25.1 vs. 74.02 ± 23.3, P > 0.05) and FIM efficiencies (0.43 ± 0.72 vs. 0.36 ± 0.51, P > 0.05) for the neoplastic and traumatic groups, respectively. However, neoplastic SCI patients demonstrated lower FIM gains compared to traumatic patients (12.9 ± 11.9 vs. 15.4 ± 15.2, P < 0.05). During rehabilitation, urinary tract infection (48.4% vs. 69.4%) and decubitus ulcer (11.6% vs. 35.9%) were significantly more common in the traumatic group than the neoplastic group (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: Neoplastic SCI patients who commonly present at rehabilitation units exhibit different characteristics from traumatic SCI patients but the rehabilitation results are similar. Similar functional development can be achieved in a shorter period of time with inpatient rehabilitation in the neoplastic SCI group.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Neoplastic spinal cord compression; Rehabilitation; Traumatic spinal cord injury

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32701391      PMCID: PMC8986217          DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2020.1794713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med        ISSN: 1079-0268            Impact factor:   1.985


  36 in total

1.  Spinal cord injury facts and figures at a glance.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.985

2.  Neoplastic vs. traumatic spinal cord injury: an inpatient rehabilitation comparison.

Authors:  W O McKinley; M E Huang; M A Tewksbury
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.159

3.  A validation of the functional independence measurement and its performance among rehabilitation inpatients.

Authors:  T A Dodds; D P Martin; W C Stolov; R A Deyo
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.966

4.  Clinical gait assessment in the neurologically impaired. Reliability and meaningfulness.

Authors:  M K Holden; K M Gill; M R Magliozzi; J Nathan; L Piehl-Baker
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1984-01

5.  Reference for the 2011 revision of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Steven C Kirshblum; William Waring; Fin Biering-Sorensen; Stephen P Burns; Mark Johansen; Mary Schmidt-Read; William Donovan; Daniel Graves; Amit Jha; Linda Jones; M J Mulcahey; Andrei Krassioukov
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 6.  Malignant Spinal Cord Compression: Adapting Conventional Rehabilitation Approaches.

Authors:  Lisa Marie Ruppert
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.784

7.  Gait assessment for neurologically impaired patients. Standards for outcome assessment.

Authors:  M K Holden; K M Gill; M R Magliozzi
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1986-10

Review 8.  Outcome measures in spinal cord injury: recent assessments and recommendations for future directions.

Authors:  M S Alexander; K D Anderson; F Biering-Sorensen; A R Blight; R Brannon; T N Bryce; G Creasey; A Catz; A Curt; W Donovan; J Ditunno; P Ellaway; N B Finnerup; D E Graves; B A Haynes; A W Heinemann; A B Jackson; M V Johnston; C Z Kalpakjian; N Kleitman; A Krassioukov; K Krogh; D Lammertse; S Magasi; M J Mulcahey; B Schurch; A Sherwood; J D Steeves; S Stiens; D S Tulsky; H J A van Hedel; G Whiteneck
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 2.772

9.  Rehabilitation of patients with nontraumatic spinal cord injury in the Netherlands: etiology, length of stay, and functional outcome.

Authors:  Jolien J Vervoordeldonk; Marcel W M Post; Peter New; M Clin Epi; Floris W A Van Asbeck
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2013

10.  Challenges in rehabilitation of patients with nontraumatic spinal cord dysfunction due to tumors : A narrative review.

Authors:  Anna Pataraia; Richard Crevenna
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 1.704

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.