Literature DB >> 15060241

First experiences with early intervention: a national perspective.

Donald B Bailey1, Kathleen Hebbeler, Anita Scarborough, Donna Spiker, Sangeeta Mallik.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Families of young children with disabilities are eligible for early intervention services as mandated by Part C of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act. Although prior research has shown that families are generally satisfied with early intervention, this research has not been based on a nationally representative sample of families, nor has it systematically examined perceptions of the initial experiences entering early intervention.
OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to determine families' initial experiences in determining their child's eligibility, interactions with medical professionals, effort required to obtain services, participation in planning for services, satisfaction with services, and interactions with professionals.
METHOD: We interviewed a nationally representative sample of 3338 parents of young children with or at risk for disability. All the children had recently entered an early intervention program operated under the auspices of Part C of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act.
RESULTS: The average age at which families reported a concern about their child was 7.4 months. A diagnosis was made, on average, 1.4 months later, the child was referred for early intervention an average of 5.2 months after the diagnosis, and the individualized family service plan was developed 1.7 months later or at an average age of 15.7 months. Most families were very positive about their entry into early intervention programs. They reported discussing their concerns with a medical professional and finding that person helpful. Families reported relative ease in accessing services, felt that services were related to their perceived needs, rated positively the professionals working in early intervention, and felt that they had a role in making key decisions about child and family goals. A small percentage of families experienced significant delays in getting services, wanted more involvement in service planning, or felt that services were inadequate, and nearly 20% were unaware of the existence of a written plan for services. Minority families, families with limited income, and families with less-educated mothers were more likely to report negative experiences.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the beginning of early intervention services generally is highly successful and responsive, a finding that should give pediatricians more confidence in referring families for early intervention services. However, research and local evaluation efforts are needed to develop strategies to assure that all families receive services in a timely and appropriate fashion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15060241     DOI: 10.1542/peds.113.4.887

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  33 in total

1.  Identifying Infants and Toddlers at High Risk for Persistent Delays.

Authors:  Beth M McManus; Cordelia C Robinson; Steven A Rosenberg
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-03

2.  A Description of the Educational Setting Among Individuals With Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Rebecca Nash; Catharine Riley; Pangaja Paramsothy; Kendra Gilbertson; Melissa Raspa; Anne Wheeler; Eric J Dziuban; Georgina Peacock
Journal:  Am J Intellect Dev Disabil       Date:  2019-01

3.  Delay to Early Intensive Behavioral Intervention and Educational Outcomes for a Medicaid-Enrolled Cohort of Children with Autism.

Authors:  Adele F Dimian; Frank J Symons; Jason J Wolff
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2021-04

4.  Comorbidity prevalence, healthcare utilization, and expenditures of Medicaid enrolled adults with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Rini Vohra; Suresh Madhavan; Usha Sambamoorthi
Journal:  Autism       Date:  2016-10-20

5.  Understanding Barriers to Early Intervention Services for Preterm Infants: Lessons From Two States.

Authors:  Alison A Little; Karen Kamholz; Brian K Corwin; Alejandra Barrero-Castillero; C Jason Wang
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.107

6.  Availing services for developmental disabilities: parental experiences from a referral center in developing country.

Authors:  Monica Juneja; Rahul Jain; Swati Singhal; Devendra Mishra
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 1.967

7.  Child's autism severity: effect on West Virginia caregiver satisfaction with school services.

Authors:  Rini Vohra; Suresh Madhavan; Rahul Khanna; Barbara Becker-Cottrill
Journal:  W V Med J       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct

8.  Outcomes of Children with Hearing Loss: Data Collection and Methods.

Authors:  J Bruce Tomblin; Elizabeth A Walker; Ryan W McCreery; Richard M Arenas; Melody Harrison; Mary Pat Moeller
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Pediatricians' knowledge, attitudes, and practice patterns regarding special education and individualized education programs.

Authors:  Reshma P Shah; Rangesh Kunnavakkam; Michael E Msall
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 3.107

10.  Parent perceptions of an adapted evidence-based practice for toddlers with autism in a community setting.

Authors:  Aubyn C Stahmer; Lauren Brookman-Frazee; Sarah R Rieth; Julia Trigeiro Stoner; Joshua D Feder; Karyn Searcy; Tiffany Wang
Journal:  Autism       Date:  2016-07-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.