MOTIVATION: Genomic research laboratories need adequate infrastructure to support management of their data production and research workflow. But what makes infrastructure adequate? A lack of appropriate criteria makes any decision on buying or developing a system difficult. Here, we report on the decision process for the case of a molecular genetics group establishing a microarray laboratory. RESULTS: Five typical requirements for experimental genomics database systems were identified: (i) evolution ability to keep up with the fast developing genomics field; (ii) a suitable data model to deal with local diversity; (iii) suitable storage of data files in the system; (iv) easy exchange with other software; and (v) low maintenance costs. The computer scientists and the researchers of the local microarray laboratory considered alternative solutions for these five requirements and chose the following options: (i) use of automatic code generation; (ii) a customized data model based on standards; (iii) storage of datasets as black boxes instead of decomposing them in database tables; (iv) loosely linking to other programs for improved flexibility; and (v) a low-maintenance web-based user interface. Our team evaluated existing microarray databases and then decided to build a new system, Molecular Genetics Information System (MOLGENIS), implemented using code generation in a period of three months. This case can provide valuable insights and lessons to both software developers and a user community embarking on large-scale genomic projects. AVAILABILITY: http://www.molgenis.nl
MOTIVATION: Genomic research laboratories need adequate infrastructure to support management of their data production and research workflow. But what makes infrastructure adequate? A lack of appropriate criteria makes any decision on buying or developing a system difficult. Here, we report on the decision process for the case of a molecular genetics group establishing a microarray laboratory. RESULTS: Five typical requirements for experimental genomics database systems were identified: (i) evolution ability to keep up with the fast developing genomics field; (ii) a suitable data model to deal with local diversity; (iii) suitable storage of data files in the system; (iv) easy exchange with other software; and (v) low maintenance costs. The computer scientists and the researchers of the local microarray laboratory considered alternative solutions for these five requirements and chose the following options: (i) use of automatic code generation; (ii) a customized data model based on standards; (iii) storage of datasets as black boxes instead of decomposing them in database tables; (iv) loosely linking to other programs for improved flexibility; and (v) a low-maintenance web-based user interface. Our team evaluated existing microarray databases and then decided to build a new system, Molecular Genetics Information System (MOLGENIS), implemented using code generation in a period of three months. This case can provide valuable insights and lessons to both software developers and a user community embarking on large-scale genomic projects. AVAILABILITY: http://www.molgenis.nl
Authors: Monica Leu; Keith Humphreys; Ida Surakka; Emil Rehnberg; Juha Muilu; Päivi Rosenström; Peter Almgren; Juha Jääskeläinen; Richard P Lifton; Kirsten Ohm Kyvik; Jaakko Kaprio; Nancy L Pedersen; Aarno Palotie; Per Hall; Henrik Grönberg; Leif Groop; Leena Peltonen; Juni Palmgren; Samuli Ripatti Journal: Eur J Hum Genet Date: 2010-07-28 Impact factor: 4.246
Authors: Morris A Swertz; Martijn Dijkstra; Tomasz Adamusiak; Joeri K van der Velde; Alexandros Kanterakis; Erik T Roos; Joris Lops; Gudmundur A Thorisson; Danny Arends; George Byelas; Juha Muilu; Anthony J Brookes; Engbert O de Brock; Ritsert C Jansen; Helen Parkinson Journal: BMC Bioinformatics Date: 2010-12-21 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Morris A Swertz; K Joeri van der Velde; Bruno M Tesson; Richard A Scheltema; Danny Arends; Gonzalo Vera; Rudi Alberts; Martijn Dijkstra; Paul Schofield; Klaus Schughart; John M Hancock; Damian Smedley; Katy Wolstencroft; Carole Goble; Engbert O de Brock; Andrew R Jones; Helen E Parkinson; Ritsert C Jansen Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2010-03-09 Impact factor: 13.583
Authors: Cong V C Truong; Linn F Groeneveld; Burkhard Morgenstern; Eildert Groeneveld Journal: BMC Bioinformatics Date: 2011-10-31 Impact factor: 3.307
Authors: Danny Arends; K Joeri van der Velde; Pjotr Prins; Karl W Broman; Steffen Möller; Ritsert C Jansen; Morris A Swertz Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2012-02-03 Impact factor: 6.937