BACKGROUND: Recent findings from randomized clinical trials on the effects of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) among postmenopausal women contradict findings from observational studies indicating a protective effect on the development of cardiovascular disease. Most observational studies on HRT are based on self-reported data, although data on the validity of HRT in postmenopausal women are sparse. METHODS: We examined self-reported HRT use from questionnaires administered in 1993 (n = 2694) and again in 1999 (n = 2666) to a cohort of Danish nurses living in two Danish counties compared with prescription-reimbursement data from two administrative databases through the Danish National Health Service. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of the self-reported, current HRT use in 1993 were 78.4%[95% confidence interval (95% CI) 75.4-81.4] and 98.4% (95% CI 97.8-98.9), respectively. In 1999, the estimates were 74.8% (95% CI 72.0-77.7) and 98.0% (95% CI 97.3-98.8), respectively. None of the factors examined--including age, alcohol intake, physical activity, smoking, presence of hypertension, and body mass index--was strongly associated with validity. We found a relatively high validity of self-reported data on HRT use. Furthermore, agreement between self-reported and registry-based data was not strongly associated with a range of demographic and lifestyle factors. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that use of self-reported data is not an important contributor to the apparent discrepancy between observational studies and randomized trials on the cardiovascular effects of HRT use.
BACKGROUND: Recent findings from randomized clinical trials on the effects of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) among postmenopausal women contradict findings from observational studies indicating a protective effect on the development of cardiovascular disease. Most observational studies on HRT are based on self-reported data, although data on the validity of HRT in postmenopausal women are sparse. METHODS: We examined self-reported HRT use from questionnaires administered in 1993 (n = 2694) and again in 1999 (n = 2666) to a cohort of Danish nurses living in two Danish counties compared with prescription-reimbursement data from two administrative databases through the Danish National Health Service. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of the self-reported, current HRT use in 1993 were 78.4%[95% confidence interval (95% CI) 75.4-81.4] and 98.4% (95% CI 97.8-98.9), respectively. In 1999, the estimates were 74.8% (95% CI 72.0-77.7) and 98.0% (95% CI 97.3-98.8), respectively. None of the factors examined--including age, alcohol intake, physical activity, smoking, presence of hypertension, and body mass index--was strongly associated with validity. We found a relatively high validity of self-reported data on HRT use. Furthermore, agreement between self-reported and registry-based data was not strongly associated with a range of demographic and lifestyle factors. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that use of self-reported data is not an important contributor to the apparent discrepancy between observational studies and randomized trials on the cardiovascular effects of HRT use.
Authors: Gitte Vrelits Sørensen; Patricia A Ganz; Steven W Cole; Lars A Pedersen; Henrik Toft Sørensen; Deirdre P Cronin-Fenton; Jens Peter Garne; Peer M Christiansen; Timothy L Lash; Thomas P Ahern Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-05-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Deirdre P Cronin-Fenton; Lars Pedersen; Timothy L Lash; Søren Friis; John A Baron; Henrik T Sørensen Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2010-03-01 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Thomas P Ahern; Lars Pedersen; Deirdre P Cronin-Fenton; Henrik Toft Sørensen; Timothy L Lash Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2009-08-18 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: E V Kane; L Bernstein; P M Bracci; J R Cerhan; L Costas; L Dal Maso; E A Holly; C La Vecchia; K Matsuo; S Sanjose; J J Spinelli; S S Wang; Y Zhang; T Zheng; E Roman; A Kricker Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2012-09-11 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: L W Lietzen; T Ahern; P Christiansen; A B Jensen; H T Sørensen; T L Lash; D P Cronin-Fenton Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2014-09-15 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Gita Mishra; Helen Kok; Russell Ecob; Rachel Cooper; Rebecca Hardy; Diana Kuh Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2006-05-30 Impact factor: 9.308