Literature DB >> 15058436

Adaptive variation in senescence: reproductive lifespan in a wild salmon population.

Andrew P Hendry1, Yolanda E Morbey, Ole K Berg, John K Wenburg.   

Abstract

The antagonistic pleiotropy theory of senescence postulates genes or traits that have opposite effects on early-life and late-life performances. Because selection is generally weaker late in life, genes or traits that improve early-life performance but impair late-life performance should come to predominate. Variation in the strength of age-specific selection should then generate adaptive variation in senescence. We demonstrate this mechanism by comparing early and late breeders within a population of semelparous capital-breeding sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). We show that early breeders (but not late breeders) are under strong selection for a long reproductive lifespan (RLS), which facilitates defence of their nests against disturbance by later females. Accordingly, early females invest less energy in egg production while reserving more for nest defence. Variation along this reproductive trade-off causes delayed or slower senescence in early females (average RLS of 26 days) than in late females (reproductive lifespan of 12 days). We use microsatellites to confirm that gene flow is sufficiently limited between early and late breeders to allow adaptive divergence in response to selection. Because reproductive trade-offs should be almost universal and selection acting on them should typically vary in time and space, the mechanism described herein may explain much of the natural variation in senescence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15058436      PMCID: PMC1691593          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2600

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  10 in total

1.  Population mixing and the adaptive divergence of quantitative traits in discrete populations: a theoretical framework for empirical tests.

Authors:  A P Hendry; T Day; E B Taylor
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 2.  Why do we age?

Authors:  T B Kirkwood; S N Austad
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-11-09       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  The evolution of senescence in fish.

Authors:  David Reznick; Cameron Ghalambor; Leonard Nunney
Journal:  Mech Ageing Dev       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.432

4.  Maximum-likelihood estimation of migration rates and effective population numbers in two populations using a coalescent approach.

Authors:  P Beerli; J Felsenstein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Antagonistic pleiotropy, mortality source interactions, and the evolutionary theory of senescence.

Authors:  Paul D Williams; Troy Day
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Directional selection and the evolution of breeding date in birds.

Authors:  T Price; M Kirkpatrick; S J Arnold
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-05-06       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Timing games in the reproductive phenology of female pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.).

Authors:  Yolanda E Morbey; Ronald C Ydenberg
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  The moulding of senescence by natural selection.

Authors:  W D Hamilton
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1966-09       Impact factor: 2.691

9.  Evolution of temporal isolation in the wild: genetic divergence in timing of migration and breeding by introduced chinook salmon populations.

Authors:  T P Quinn; M J Unwin; M T Kinnison
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 10.  Mechanisms of ageing: public or private?

Authors:  Linda Partridge; David Gems
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 53.242

  10 in total
  19 in total

1.  Life history variation is maintained by fitness trade-offs and negative frequency-dependent selection.

Authors:  Mark R Christie; Gordon G McNickle; Rod A French; Michael S Blouin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  It's a bear market: evolutionary and ecological effects of predation on two wild sockeye salmon populations.

Authors:  J E Lin; J J Hard; K A Naish; D Peterson; R Hilborn; L Hauser
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Significance of cellular senescence in aging and cancer.

Authors:  Angela Grimes; Sathees B C Chandra
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 4.679

4.  Colour-assortative mating among populations of Tropheus moorii, a cichlid fish from Lake Tanganyika, East Africa.

Authors:  Walter Salzburger; Harald Niederstätter; Anita Brandstätter; Burkhard Berger; Walther Parson; Jos Snoeks; Christian Sturmbauer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Age-dependent genetic variance in a life-history trait in the mute swan.

Authors:  Anne Charmantier; Christopher Perrins; Robin H McCleery; Ben C Sheldon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Mortality rate acceleration and post-reproductive lifespan in matrilineal whale species.

Authors:  Andrew D Foote
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Adaptive landscapes and density-dependent selection in declining salmonid populations: going beyond numerical responses to human disturbance.

Authors:  Sigurd Einum; Grethe Robertsen; Ian A Fleming
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 5.183

8.  Predation by bears drives senescence in natural populations of salmon.

Authors:  Stephanie M Carlson; Ray Hilborn; Andrew P Hendry; Thomas P Quinn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Alive and well? Exploring disease by studying lifespan.

Authors:  Jamie O Brett; Thomas A Rando
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2014-07-06       Impact factor: 5.578

10.  Parallel evolution of senescence in annual fishes in response to extrinsic mortality.

Authors:  Eva Terzibasi Tozzini; Alexander Dorn; Enoch Ng'oma; Matej Polačik; Radim Blažek; Kathrin Reichwald; Andreas Petzold; Brian Watters; Martin Reichard; Alessandro Cellerino
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.