Erik B van Munster1, Theodorus W J Gadella. 1. Molecular Cytology Section, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. munster@science.uva.nl
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Photobleaching can lead to significant errors in frequency-domain fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM). Existing correction methods for photobleaching require additional recordings and processing time and can result in additional noise. A method is introduced that suppresses the effects of photobleaching without the need for extra recordings or processing. METHODS: Existing bleach correction methods and the method introduced in this report whereby the recording order of the phases is permuted were compared using numerical simulations. RESULTS: Certain orders were found to make measurements virtually insensitive to photobleaching. At 12 recordings, errors in measured phase and modulation depth decreased by a factor 512 and 393, respectively, compared to recordings using sequential recording order. The optimal order is independent of modulation depth, phase, and extent of photobleaching. Thus, the same order can be used for practically all situations. Application of the method in FLIM measurements of EYFP-transfected HeLa cells was found effectively to suppress photobleaching induced artifacts. CONCLUSIONS: In view of the ease of implementation, its inherent robustness, and the possibility to still apply existing correction methods afterward, there is no good reason not to use the permuted recording order presented in this report instead of a sequential order. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
BACKGROUND: Photobleaching can lead to significant errors in frequency-domain fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM). Existing correction methods for photobleaching require additional recordings and processing time and can result in additional noise. A method is introduced that suppresses the effects of photobleaching without the need for extra recordings or processing. METHODS: Existing bleach correction methods and the method introduced in this report whereby the recording order of the phases is permuted were compared using numerical simulations. RESULTS: Certain orders were found to make measurements virtually insensitive to photobleaching. At 12 recordings, errors in measured phase and modulation depth decreased by a factor 512 and 393, respectively, compared to recordings using sequential recording order. The optimal order is independent of modulation depth, phase, and extent of photobleaching. Thus, the same order can be used for practically all situations. Application of the method in FLIM measurements of EYFP-transfected HeLa cells was found effectively to suppress photobleaching induced artifacts. CONCLUSIONS: In view of the ease of implementation, its inherent robustness, and the possibility to still apply existing correction methods afterward, there is no good reason not to use the permuted recording order presented in this report instead of a sequential order. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Hernán E Grecco; Pedro Roda-Navarro; Andreas Girod; Jian Hou; Thomas Frahm; Dina C Truxius; Rainer Pepperkok; Anthony Squire; Philippe I H Bastiaens Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2010-05-09 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: Judith Gillis; Sabine Schipper-Krom; Katrin Juenemann; Anna Gruber; Silvia Coolen; Rian van den Nieuwendijk; Henk van Veen; Hermen Overkleeft; Joachim Goedhart; Harm H Kampinga; Eric A Reits Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2013-04-23 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: José Rino; Joana M P Desterro; Teresa R Pacheco; Theodorus W J Gadella; Maria Carmo-Fonseca Journal: Mol Cell Biol Date: 2008-02-19 Impact factor: 4.272