Literature DB >> 15055409

Periodic abstinence from Pap (PAP) smear study: women's perceptions of Pap smear screening.

Mindy Smith1, Linda French, Henry C Barry.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to explore attitudes, beliefs, and perceived barriers to risk-based cervical cancer screening through focus group interviews of patients.
METHODS: We conducted 8 focus group interviews of women using semistructured interviews. The investigators independently reviewed the focus group transcripts and identified the overall themes and themes unique to each question using an immersion and crystallization approach.
RESULTS: Women are in agreement that cervical cancer screening is important and that women should get Pap smears regularly as an important way of protecting their health. They are not open to the idea of reducing the frequency of Papanicolaou (Pap) smears, however, because they perceive annual screening to be successful in reducing cervical cancer mortality. Additionally, they have concerns about test accuracy. Women are distrustful of the rationale for reducing the frequency of Pap smears. Women's previous bad experiences have reinforced their need for self-advocacy.
CONCLUSION: Women are reluctant to engage in risk-based cervical cancer screening. In this environment, risk-based cervical cancer screening recommendations are likely to be met with resistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 15055409      PMCID: PMC1466607          DOI: 10.1370/afm.32

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Fam Med        ISSN: 1544-1709            Impact factor:   5.166


  24 in total

1.  ACOG committee opinion. Recommendations on frequency of Pap test screening. Number 152--March 1995. Committee on Gynecologic Practice. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.561

2.  Mammography, clinical breast exam, and pap testing: correlates of combined screening.

Authors:  D N Pearlman; W Rakowski; B Ehrich
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Reliability of sexual histories in heterosexual couples.

Authors:  N S Padian; S Aral; K Vranizan; G Bolan
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  1995 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.830

4.  Reporting recent sexual practices: gay men's disclosure of HIV risk by questionnaire and interview.

Authors:  K Siegel; B J Krauss; D Karus
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  1994-04

5.  The validity of self-reported condom use among adolescents.

Authors:  M L Shew; G J Remafedi; L H Bearinger; P L Faulkner; B A Taylor; S J Potthoff; M D Resnick
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.830

Review 6.  Patients misrepresenting their risk factors for AIDS.

Authors:  S Brody
Journal:  Int J STD AIDS       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.359

7.  Relationship between Pap smear performance and physician ordering a mammogram.

Authors:  P J Murata; J E Li
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 0.493

8.  Feasibility, reliability and women's views of a risk scoring system for cervical neoplasia in primary care.

Authors:  C E Wilkinson; T J Peters; I M Harvey; N C Stott
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Validity of self-reporting of episodes of external genital warts.

Authors:  D J Wiley; Stella Grosser; Karen Qi; Barbara R Visscher; Karl Beutner; Steffanie A Strathdee; Bridget Calhoun; Frank Palella; Roger Detels
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2002-06-06       Impact factor: 9.079

10.  Cancer statistics, 1995.

Authors:  P A Wingo; T Tong; S Bolden
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1995 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

View more
  5 in total

1.  What Australian women want and when they want it: cervical screening testing preferences, decision-making styles and information needs.

Authors:  Mbathio Dieng; Lyndal Trevena; Robin M Turner; Monika Wadolowski; Kirsten McCaffery
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Perceived risk of cervical cancer among low-income women.

Authors:  Gladys B Asiedu; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Daniel M Breitkopf
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Ending cervical cancer screening: attitudes and beliefs from ethnically diverse older women.

Authors:  George F Sawaya; A Yuri Iwaoka-Scott; Sue Kim; Sabrina T Wong; Alison J Huang; A Eugene Washington; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 4.  Cervical cancer screening and psychosocial barriers perceived by patients. A systematic review.

Authors:  Alicja Bukowska-Durawa; Aleksandra Luszczynska
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2014-06-18

5.  Pap Testing in a High-Income Country with Suboptimal Compliance Levels: A Survey on Acceptance Factors among Sicilian Women.

Authors:  Vincenzo Restivo; Claudio Costantino; Antonello Marras; Giuseppe Napoli; Sabrina Scelfo; Tiziana Scuderi; Alessandra Casuccio; Achille Cernigliaro; Angela Giusti; Stefania Spila Alegiani
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.