Literature DB >> 15055293

Toxicological considerations in the application and interpretation of susceptibility biomarkers in epidemiological studies.

Anneclaire J De Roos1, Martyn T Smith, Stephen Chanock, Nathaniel Rothman.   

Abstract

With major advances in genotyping technology, it has become practical and affordable to screen biological samples for multiple polymorphisms for which there is more or less knowledge about their functional relevance in relation to toxicological agents or disease. This situation creates some unique epidemiological challenges in which careful consideration of the mechanisms underlying genotype-disease and genotype-exposure-disease relationships, or the lack of knowledge thereof, may help to prevent false-positive results or misinterpretation of data that could mislead future research. Coordination and linkage of data resources on toxicological exposures, genes and disease would be useful as an integrated source of information to devise study design, analysis and interpretation. Such a database could be useful in collating information from which to determine relevant exposures for the disease and to guide the selection of susceptibility markers for study. Further information on toxicological mechanisms and functional relevance of gene variants in relation to disease could be accounted for in statistical analyses and interpretation. Statistical methods that can incorporate this prior information on mechanism, such as hierarchical regression modelling, may help to mitigate some of the problems inherent to these studies by adjusting estimates and confidence limits according to this prior information. Even in the situation where little information on etiological mechanisms is available, application of a less informed prior can be beneficial in improving the accuracy and precision for an ensemble of estimates. The changing paradigm of epidemiological research with regard to increasing detail of underlying mechanisms and the sheer amount of data being evaluated necessitates access to sources of information and analytic methods that can integrate this complexity.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15055293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IARC Sci Publ        ISSN: 0300-5038


  5 in total

1.  Recommendations and proposed guidelines for assessing the cumulative evidence on joint effects of genes and environments on cancer occurrence in humans.

Authors:  Paolo Boffetta; Deborah M Winn; John P Ioannidis; Duncan C Thomas; Julian Little; George Davey Smith; Vincent J Cogliano; Stephen S Hecht; Daniela Seminara; Paolo Vineis; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  Genetic epidemiology with a capital E: where will we be in another 10 years?

Authors:  Duncan C Thomas
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 2.135

3.  Health risk assessment on human exposed to heavy metals in the ambient air PM10 in Ahvaz, southwest Iran.

Authors:  Gholamreza Goudarzi; Nadali Alavi; Sahar Geravandi; Esmaeil Idani; Hamid Reza Adeli Behrooz; Ali Akbar Babaei; Farzaneh Aslanpour Alamdari; Sina Dobaradaran; Majid Farhadi; Mohammad Javad Mohammadi
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 3.787

Review 4.  Methods for investigating gene-environment interactions in candidate pathway and genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Duncan Thomas
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 21.981

5.  Thyroid nodules, polymorphic variants in DNA repair and RET-related genes, and interaction with ionizing radiation exposure from nuclear tests in Kazakhstan.

Authors:  Alice J Sigurdson; Charles E Land; Parveen Bhatti; Marbin Pineda; Alina Brenner; Zhanat Carr; Boris I Gusev; Zhaxibay Zhumadilov; Steven L Simon; Andre Bouville; Joni L Rutter; Elaine Ron; Jeffery P Struewing
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.841

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.