INTRODUCTION: Pro or precursor forms of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) have emerged as potentially important diagnostic serum markers for prostate cancer detection. Immunoassays were developed to measure specific proPSA forms containing propeptides of 2, 4, and 7 amino acids [(-2)proPSA, (-4)proPSA, and (-7)proPSA, respectively]. METHODS: Research-use dual monoclonal antibody immunoassays using europium-labeled detection monoclonal antibodies were developed for each form of proPSA. Sera from patients with prostate cancer or benign prostate disease containing 4-10 microg/L PSA were assayed and analyzed by area under the ROC curve (AUC) for specificity and sensitivity. RESULTS: The proPSA forms had quantification limits of 0.015-0.025 microg/L in serum, with cross-reactivities <1% with PSA. The sum of the proPSA forms divided by free PSA (percentage proPSA) had a higher AUC than did percentage of (-2)proPSA, free PSA, and complexed PSA with AUC (95% confidence intervals) of 0.69 (0.64-0.74), 0.64 (0.58-0.68), 0.63 (0.58-0.68), and 0.57 (0.51-0.62), respectively. The proPSA comprised a median of 33% of the free PSA in cancer and 25% in noncancer sera (P <0.0001). One-third (33%) of cancer samples had >40% proPSA, whereas only 8% of noncancer samples did (P <0.0001). In men with cancer and >25% free PSA, the (-2)proPSA had an AUC of 0.77 (0.66-0.86), with 90% sensitivity and 36% specificity at 0.04 microg/L. CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of proPSA gave better cancer detection in the 4-10 microg/L range than did percentage of free PSA and complexed PSA. (-2)proPSA significantly discriminated cancer in men whose serum had >25% free PSA, for whom there is currently no good marker for cancer detection.
INTRODUCTION: Pro or precursor forms of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) have emerged as potentially important diagnostic serum markers for prostate cancer detection. Immunoassays were developed to measure specific proPSA forms containing propeptides of 2, 4, and 7 amino acids [(-2)proPSA, (-4)proPSA, and (-7)proPSA, respectively]. METHODS: Research-use dual monoclonal antibody immunoassays using europium-labeled detection monoclonal antibodies were developed for each form of proPSA. Sera from patients with prostate cancer or benign prostate disease containing 4-10 microg/L PSA were assayed and analyzed by area under the ROC curve (AUC) for specificity and sensitivity. RESULTS: The proPSA forms had quantification limits of 0.015-0.025 microg/L in serum, with cross-reactivities <1% with PSA. The sum of the proPSA forms divided by free PSA (percentage proPSA) had a higher AUC than did percentage of (-2)proPSA, free PSA, and complexed PSA with AUC (95% confidence intervals) of 0.69 (0.64-0.74), 0.64 (0.58-0.68), 0.63 (0.58-0.68), and 0.57 (0.51-0.62), respectively. The proPSA comprised a median of 33% of the free PSA in cancer and 25% in noncancer sera (P <0.0001). One-third (33%) of cancer samples had >40% proPSA, whereas only 8% of noncancer samples did (P <0.0001). In men with cancer and >25% free PSA, the (-2)proPSA had an AUC of 0.77 (0.66-0.86), with 90% sensitivity and 36% specificity at 0.04 microg/L. CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of proPSA gave better cancer detection in the 4-10 microg/L range than did percentage of free PSA and complexed PSA. (-2)proPSA significantly discriminated cancer in men whose serum had >25% free PSA, for whom there is currently no good marker for cancer detection.
Authors: Yuanyuan Liang; Donna P Ankerst; Norma S Ketchum; Barbara Ercole; Girish Shah; John D Shaughnessy; Robin J Leach; Ian M Thompson Journal: J Urol Date: 2010-11-12 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Brian V Le; Christopher R Griffin; Stacy Loeb; Gustavo F Carvalhal; Donghui Kan; Nikola A Baumann; William J Catalona Journal: J Urol Date: 2010-02-19 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Lori J Sokoll; Martin G Sanda; Ziding Feng; Jacob Kagan; Isaac A Mizrahi; Dennis L Broyles; Alan W Partin; Sudhir Srivastava; Ian M Thompson; John T Wei; Zhen Zhang; Daniel W Chan Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Sigrid V Carlsson; Mari T Peltola; Daniel Sjoberg; Fritz H Schröder; Jonas Hugosson; Kim Pettersson; Peter T Scardino; Andrew J Vickers; Hans Lilja; Monique J Roobol Journal: BJU Int Date: 2013-02-28 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Stacy Loeb; Lori J Sokoll; Dennis L Broyles; Chris H Bangma; Ron H N van Schaik; George G Klee; John T Wei; Martin G Sanda; Alan W Partin; Kevin M Slawin; Leonard S Marks; Isaac A Mizrahi; Sanghyuk S Shin; Amabelle B Cruz; Daniel W Chan; William L Roberts; William J Catalona Journal: J Urol Date: 2012-11-30 Impact factor: 7.450