Literature DB >> 15053719

A revised methodology for research on metamemory: Pre-judgment Recall and Monitoring (PRAM).

Thomas O Nelson1, Louis Narens, John Dunlosky.   

Abstract

A revised methodology is described for research on metacognitive monitoring, especially judgments of learning (JOLs), to investigate psychological processing that previously has been only hypothetical and unobservable. During data collection a new stage of recall occurs just prior to the JOL, so that during data analysis the items can be partitioned into subcategories to measure the degree of JOL accuracy in ways that are more analytic than was previously possible. A weighted-average combinatorial rule allows the component measures of JOL accuracy to be combined into the usual overall measure of metacognitive accuracy. An example using the revised methodology offers a new explanation for the delayed-JOL effect, in which delayed JOLs are more accurate than immediate JOLs for predicting recall. (c) 2004 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15053719     DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.9.1.53

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Methods        ISSN: 1082-989X


  19 in total

1.  Age invariance in feeling of knowing during implicit interference effects.

Authors:  Deborah K Eakin; Christopher Hertzog
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 4.077

2.  Illusions of competence during study can be remedied by manipulations that enhance learners' sensitivity to retrieval conditions at test.

Authors:  Asher Koriat; Robert A Bjork
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-07

3.  Delayed judgments of learning cause both a decrease in absolute accuracy (calibration) and an increase in relative accuracy (resolution).

Authors:  James P Van Overschelde; Thomas O Nelson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-10

4.  Judgments of learning: evidence for a two-stage process.

Authors:  Lisa K Son; Janet Metcalfe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-09

5.  Metacognition and learning about primacy and recency effects in free recall: the utilization of intrinsic and extrinsic cues when making judgments of learning.

Authors:  Alan D Castel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-03

6.  Immediate judgments of learning are insensitive to implicit interference effects at retrieval.

Authors:  Deborah K Eakin; Christopher Hertzog
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-01

7.  The sensitivity of judgment-of-learning resolution to past test performance, new learning, and forgetting.

Authors:  Robert Ariel; John Dunlosky
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-01

8.  Making judgments of learning enhances memory by inducing item-specific processing.

Authors:  Olesya Senkova; Hajime Otani
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-01-04

9.  Familiarity and retrieval processes in delayed judgments of learning.

Authors:  Janet Metcalfe; Bridgid Finn
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Using the past to predict the future.

Authors:  Michael R Dougherty; Petra Scheck; Thomas O Nelson; Louis Narens
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.