Literature DB >> 15053183

Hemodynamics of chronic nonpulsatile flow: implications for LVAD development.

Satoshi Saito1, Tomohiro Nishinaka, Stephen Westaby.   

Abstract

Both experimental and clinical evidence suggest that pulse pressure is not required from a blood pump. End-organ function is well maintained with nonpulsatile systems, though pulse pressure may accelerate recovery from cardiogenic shock. Form follows function, so the effects of reduced pulse pressure on the arterial wall are not surprising. The ability to alter aortic wall morphology by reducing pulse pressure may have important implications for the future treatment of arterial pathology. Both centrifugal and axial-flow pumps can be miniaturized and are silent. Their reliability and user-friendly status may soon allow implantation at an earlier stage of cardiac deterioration. Doubts about the feasibility of long-term pulseless circulation are disappearing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15053183     DOI: 10.1016/S0039-6109(03)00220-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Clin North Am        ISSN: 0039-6109            Impact factor:   2.741


  6 in total

1.  In vivo evaluation of the HeartWare centrifugal ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Egemen Tuzun; Katy Roberts; William E Cohn; Murat Sargin; Courtney J Gemmato; Branislav Radovancevic; O H Frazier
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2007

Review 2.  Kidney dysfunction and left ventricular assist device support: a comprehensive perioperative review.

Authors:  Samuel T Coffin; Dia R Waguespack; Nicholas A Haglund; Simon Maltais; Jamie P Dwyer; Mary E Keebler
Journal:  Cardiorenal Med       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 2.041

Review 3.  Cardiogenic shock in ACS. Part 2: Role of mechanical circulatory support.

Authors:  Stephen Westaby; Kyriakos Anastasiadis; George M Wieselthaler
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 32.419

4.  Alterations of pulse pressure stimulate arterial wall matrix remodeling.

Authors:  Qingping Yao; Danika M Hayman; Qiuxia Dai; Merry L Lindsey; Hai-Chao Han
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  Inappropriate restrictions on life saving technology.

Authors:  Stephen Westaby; David Taggart
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Hemodynamic Differences Between Central ECMO and Peripheral ECMO: A Primary CFD Study.

Authors:  Kaiyun Gu; Ya Zhang; Bin Gao; Yu Chang; Yi Zeng
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-03-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.