Literature DB >> 15051773

18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography in staging of locally advanced breast cancer.

Jacobus J M van der Hoeven1, Nanda C Krak, Otto S Hoekstra, Emile F I Comans, Robert P A Boom, Dick van Geldere, Sybren Meijer, Elsken van der Wall, Jan Buter, Herbert M Pinedo, Gerrit J J Teule, Adriaan A Lammertsma.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the effect of adding whole-body (18)F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) to conventional screening for distant metastases in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: All women with LABC referred for participation in the LABC Spinoza trial were considered eligible for this study. Patients were included if chest x-ray, bone scan, liver ultrasound, or computed tomography scan performed by the referring physician failed to reveal distant metastases. They underwent whole-body FDG PET scanning before therapy. Patients with subsequently proven distant metastases were switched to alternative forms of chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, or both.
RESULTS: Among the 48 patients evaluated with PET, 14 had abnormal FDG uptake, and metastases were suspected in 12. After simple clinical evaluation (plain x-ray, history), 10 sites that were suggestive of abnormality remained. Further work-up revealed that four sites were metastases. Proven false positivity occurred in one patient with sarcoidosis. In the other five patients, the reason for abnormal FDG uptake (liver, lung, bone) remained unclear, and patients were treated as planned. Eleven months later, distant metastases were found in one patient at sites unrelated to the previous FDG uptake.
CONCLUSION: The addition of FDG PET to the standard work-up of patients with LABC may lead to the detection of unexpected distant metastases. This may contribute to a more realistic stratification between patients with true stage III breast cancer and those who are in fact suffering from stage IV disease. Abnormal PET findings should be confirmed to prevent patients from being denied appropriate treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15051773     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.07.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  20 in total

1.  Whither the PET scan? The role of PET imaging in the staging and treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Alessandra Gennari; Arnoldo Piccardo; Vania Altrinetti; Davide Corradengo; Giampiero Villavecchia; Andrea De Censi
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 2.  Current and future use of positron emission tomography (PET) in breast cancer.

Authors:  David A Mankoff; William B Eubank
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.673

Review 3.  Should FDG PET/CT be used for the initial staging of breast cancer?

Authors:  David Groheux; Elif Hindié; Domenico Rubello; Marc Espié; Georges Baillet; Sylvie Giacchetti; Jean-Louis Misset; Jean-Luc Moretti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT provides powerful prognostic stratification in the primary staging of large breast cancer when compared with conventional explorations.

Authors:  Alexandre Cochet; Inna Dygai-Cochet; Jean-Marc Riedinger; Olivier Humbert; Alina Berriolo-Riedinger; Michel Toubeau; Séverine Guiu; Charles Coutant; Bruno Coudert; Pierre Fumoleau; François Brunotte
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  FDG-PET/CT for systemic staging of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer.

Authors:  David Groheux
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Correlation of high 18F-FDG uptake to clinical, pathological and biological prognostic factors in breast cancer.

Authors:  David Groheux; Sylvie Giacchetti; Jean-Luc Moretti; Raphael Porcher; Marc Espié; Jacqueline Lehmann-Che; Anne de Roquancourt; Anne-Sophie Hamy; Caroline Cuvier; Laetitia Vercellino; Elif Hindié
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-11-06       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  FDG-PET/CT compared with conventional imaging in the detection of distant metastases of primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Naoki Niikura; Colleen M Costelloe; John E Madewell; Naoki Hayashi; Tse-Kuan Yu; Jun Liu; Shana L Palla; Yutaka Tokuda; Richard L Theriault; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Naoto T Ueno
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-07-17

8.  Whole-body 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) for staging locally advanced breast cancer: A prospective study from a tertiary cancer centre in south India.

Authors:  Sivanath Reddy Gajjala; Narendra Hulikal; Silpa Kadiyala; Radhika Kottu; Tekchand Kalawat
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 9.  Role of Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Pankaj Kumar Garg; Suryanarayana V S Deo; Rakesh Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-07-02

10.  Utility of [18F] Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (FDG PET/CT) in the Initial Staging and Response Assessment of Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Narendra Hulikal; Sivanath Reddy Gajjala; Teck Chand Kalawat; Radhika Kottu; Lakshmi Amancharla Yadagiri
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-07-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.