PURPOSE: Reduced tumor cell adhesion is associated with invasive growth and unfavorable prognosis. In endometrial carcinoma, the prognostic impact of adhesion markers (E-cadherin, beta-catenin [beta-catenin], P-cadherin, and p120(ctn)) is partly unknown. We wanted to examine the expression pattern and prognostic value of these molecules in a population-based series of endometrial carcinoma patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients diagnosed with endometrial carcinoma between 1981 and 1990 in Hordaland County, Norway, were included. Paraffin-embedded tumor tissue was available for 96% of the patients (n = 286), and was studied immunohistochemically for expression of E-cadherin, beta-catenin, P-cadherin, and p120(ctn). The tissue microarray technique was used for P-cadherin and p120(ctn). Median follow-up time for survivors was 9 years (range, 4 to 16 years) and follow-up was complete. RESULTS: Pathologic expression of P-cadherin, E-cadherin, and beta-catenin was associated with a majority of the clinicopathologic variables. In univariate survival analyses, all adhesion markers influenced survival significantly (P <.05). Tumors with pathologic expression of both E-cadherin (low expression) and P-cadherin (high expression; 19%), and beta-catenin (low expression) and P-cadherin (high expression; 16%), had significantly reduced survival compared with the remaining samples (P <.001 for both). In multivariate models, all markers except E-cadherin showed independent prognostic significance in addition to the traditional tumor features. CONCLUSION: Differential expression of P-cadherin and beta-catenin seems to be important in endometrial carcinoma and is associated with aggressive subgroups. Our findings also indicate that a shift from E-cadherin to P-cadherin expression (cadherin switch) is an important prognostic feature in these tumors.
PURPOSE: Reduced tumor cell adhesion is associated with invasive growth and unfavorable prognosis. In endometrial carcinoma, the prognostic impact of adhesion markers (E-cadherin, beta-catenin [beta-catenin], P-cadherin, and p120(ctn)) is partly unknown. We wanted to examine the expression pattern and prognostic value of these molecules in a population-based series of endometrial carcinomapatients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients diagnosed with endometrial carcinoma between 1981 and 1990 in Hordaland County, Norway, were included. Paraffin-embedded tumor tissue was available for 96% of the patients (n = 286), and was studied immunohistochemically for expression of E-cadherin, beta-catenin, P-cadherin, and p120(ctn). The tissue microarray technique was used for P-cadherin and p120(ctn). Median follow-up time for survivors was 9 years (range, 4 to 16 years) and follow-up was complete. RESULTS: Pathologic expression of P-cadherin, E-cadherin, and beta-catenin was associated with a majority of the clinicopathologic variables. In univariate survival analyses, all adhesion markers influenced survival significantly (P <.05). Tumors with pathologic expression of both E-cadherin (low expression) and P-cadherin (high expression; 19%), and beta-catenin (low expression) and P-cadherin (high expression; 16%), had significantly reduced survival compared with the remaining samples (P <.001 for both). In multivariate models, all markers except E-cadherin showed independent prognostic significance in addition to the traditional tumor features. CONCLUSION: Differential expression of P-cadherin and beta-catenin seems to be important in endometrial carcinoma and is associated with aggressive subgroups. Our findings also indicate that a shift from E-cadherin to P-cadherin expression (cadherin switch) is an important prognostic feature in these tumors.
Authors: Monica Mannelqvist; Ingunn M Stefansson; Geir Bredholt; Trond Hellem Bø; Anne M Oyan; Inge Jonassen; Karl-Henning Kalland; Helga B Salvesen; Lars A Akslen Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Meenakshi Singh; Kathleen M Darcy; William E Brady; Rashna Clubwala; Zachary Weber; Jon V Rittenbach; Ali Akalin; Charles W Whitney; Richard Zaino; Nilsa C Ramirez; Kimberly K Leslie Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2011-08-03 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Shannon N Westin; Zhenlin Ju; Russell R Broaddus; Camilla Krakstad; Jane Li; Navdeep Pal; Karen H Lu; Robert L Coleman; Bryan T Hennessy; Samuel J Klempner; Henrica M J Werner; Helga B Salvesen; Lewis C Cantley; Gordon B Mills; Andrea P Myers Journal: Mol Oncol Date: 2015-05-16 Impact factor: 6.603