Literature DB >> 15050576

Effects of repetition learning on upright, inverted and contrast-reversed face processing using ERPs.

Roxane J Itier1, Margot J Taylor.   

Abstract

The effects of short-term learning on memory for inverted, contrast-reversed and upright faces were investigated using event-related potentials (ERPs) in a target/nontarget discrimination task following a learning phase of the target. Subjects were equally accurate for all three face types although responding more slowly to inverted and negative faces compared to upright faces. Face type affected both early ERP components P1 and N170, and long-latency components at frontal and parietal sites, reflecting the difficulty of processing inverted faces. Different effects of face type were found for P1 and N170 latencies and amplitudes, suggesting face processing could start around 100-120 ms and is sensitive to facial configuration. Repetition effects were also found on both early and long-latency components. Reduced N170 latency and amplitude for repeated targets are likely due to perceptual priming. Repetition effects on the N250 were delayed for inverted and negative faces, suggesting delayed access to stored facial representations for these formats. Increased frontopolar positivity at 250-300 ms and parietal positivity from 300 to 500 ms reflected familiarity 'old-new' repetition effects that were of similar magnitude for all three face types, indexing the accurate recognition of all faces. Thus, while structural encoding was disrupted by inversion and contrast-reversal, the learning phase was sufficient to abolish the effects of these configural manipulations behaviourally; all three face types were equally well recognised and this was reflected as equally large parietal old-new effects.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15050576     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  40 in total

1.  Rapid perceptual integration of facial expression and emotional body language.

Authors:  Hanneke K M Meeren; Corné C R J van Heijnsbergen; Beatrice de Gelder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-10-31       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Neural adaptation is related to face repetition irrespective of identity: a reappraisal of the N170 effect.

Authors:  Ido Amihai; Leon Y Deouell; Shlomo Bentin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Early dissociation of face and object processing: a magnetoencephalographic study.

Authors:  Ana Susac; Risto J Ilmoniemi; Elina Pihko; Jussi Nurminen; Selma Supek
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Effect of configural distortion on a face-related ERP evoked by random dots blinking.

Authors:  Kensaku Miki; Shoko Watanabe; Yasuyuki Takeshima; Mika Teruya; Yukiko Honda; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Knowledge is power: how conceptual knowledge transforms visual cognition.

Authors:  Jessica A Collins; Ingrid R Olson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-08

6.  "Wanted!" the effects of reward on face recognition: electrophysiological correlates.

Authors:  Francesco Marini; Tessa Marzi; Maria P Viggiano
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Neural correlates of face gender discrimination learning.

Authors:  Junzhu Su; Qingleng Tan; Fang Fang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  The early development of face processing--what makes faces special?

Authors:  Stefanie Hoehl; Stefanie Peykarjou
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 5.203

9.  Dissociation of category versus item priming in face processing: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  Mingdi Xu; Johan Lauwereyns; Keiji Iramina
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2011-12-11       Impact factor: 5.082

10.  Beauty is in the ease of the beholding: a neurophysiological test of the averageness theory of facial attractiveness.

Authors:  Logan T Trujillo; Jessica M Jankowitsch; Judith H Langlois
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.282

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.