AIMS: The aim of study 1 was to develop a three-factor Approach and Avoidance of Alcohol Questionnaire (AAAQ), designed to assess mild and intense inclinations to drink, as well as inclinations to avoid drinking. The aims of study 2 were to cross-validate the AAAQ with an independent sample and to test the goodness-of-fit of three models of craving for alcohol: (a) the traditional unidimensional model; (b) a two-dimensional, approach-avoidance ambivalence model; and (c) an expanded two-dimensional neuroanatomical model that retains avoidance, while positing a threshold that partitions approach into two distinct levels and relates all three factors involved in craving to brain pathways associated with inhibitory processes, reward and obsessive-compulsive behaviour, respectively. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The survey was administered to 589 Australian university students (69% women) in study 1 and to 523 American university students (64% women) in study 2. MEASUREMENTS: Inclinations to drink and to not drink (AAAQ), drinking behaviour (quantity and frequency), drinking problems (Young Adult Alcohol Problems Screening Test; YAAPST) and readiness for change (Stages of Change Readiness and Treatment Eagerness Scale; SOCRATES). FINDINGS: The expanded two-dimensional neuroanatomical model provided the best fit to the data. The AAAQ explained a substantial proportion of the variance in drinking frequency (41-53%), drinking quantity (49-60%) and drinking problems (43%). AAAQ profiles differed as a function of drinking-related risk, and the three AAAQ scales differentially predicted readiness for change. CONCLUSIONS: Approach and avoidance inclinations toward alcohol are separable constructs, and their activation may not be invariably reciprocal. Craving can be defined as the relative activation of substance-related response inclinations along these two primary dimensions. There may be a threshold of intensity that separates mild from intense approach inclinations.
AIMS: The aim of study 1 was to develop a three-factor Approach and Avoidance of Alcohol Questionnaire (AAAQ), designed to assess mild and intense inclinations to drink, as well as inclinations to avoid drinking. The aims of study 2 were to cross-validate the AAAQ with an independent sample and to test the goodness-of-fit of three models of craving for alcohol: (a) the traditional unidimensional model; (b) a two-dimensional, approach-avoidance ambivalence model; and (c) an expanded two-dimensional neuroanatomical model that retains avoidance, while positing a threshold that partitions approach into two distinct levels and relates all three factors involved in craving to brain pathways associated with inhibitory processes, reward and obsessive-compulsive behaviour, respectively. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The survey was administered to 589 Australian university students (69% women) in study 1 and to 523 American university students (64% women) in study 2. MEASUREMENTS: Inclinations to drink and to not drink (AAAQ), drinking behaviour (quantity and frequency), drinking problems (Young Adult Alcohol Problems Screening Test; YAAPST) and readiness for change (Stages of Change Readiness and Treatment Eagerness Scale; SOCRATES). FINDINGS: The expanded two-dimensional neuroanatomical model provided the best fit to the data. The AAAQ explained a substantial proportion of the variance in drinking frequency (41-53%), drinking quantity (49-60%) and drinking problems (43%). AAAQ profiles differed as a function of drinking-related risk, and the three AAAQ scales differentially predicted readiness for change. CONCLUSIONS: Approach and avoidance inclinations toward alcohol are separable constructs, and their activation may not be invariably reciprocal. Craving can be defined as the relative activation of substance-related response inclinations along these two primary dimensions. There may be a threshold of intensity that separates mild from intense approach inclinations.
Authors: Rebecca A Ferrer; K Rivet Amico; Angela Bryan; William A Fisher; Deborah H Cornman; Susan M Kiene; Jeffrey D Fisher Journal: Prev Sci Date: 2008-10-18
Authors: Jason M Sharbanee; Werner G K Stritzke; M Effin Jamalludin; Reinout W Wiers Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2013-11-01 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Robert C Schlauch; Rita L Christensen; Jaye L Derrick; Cory A Crane; R Lorraine Collins Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Robert C Schlauch; Daniel Gwynn-Shapiro; Paul R Stasiewicz; Danielle S Molnar; Alan R Lang Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2012-12-08 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Carolin Eberl; Reinout W Wiers; Steffen Pawelczack; Mike Rinck; Eni S Becker; Johannes Lindenmeyer Journal: Dev Cogn Neurosci Date: 2012-11-14 Impact factor: 6.464
Authors: Kristen P Lindgren; Clayton Neighbors; Bethany A Teachman; Scott A Baldwin; Jeanette Norris; Debra Kaysen; Melissa L Gasser; Reinout W Wiers Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 4.267