Literature DB >> 15048752

Routine use of laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer.

W T Siu1, C H Chau, B K B Law, C N Tang, P Y Ha, M K W Li.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer was reported in 1990 but has not gained wide acceptance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer in routine clinical practice.
METHODS: This was a prospective analysis of 172 patients who underwent laparoscopic repair of a perforated peptic ulcer between July 1997 and June 2003.
RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-two patients of mean age 54 (range 14-93) years had perforated peptic ulcer diagnosed by laparoscopy. There were 172 duodenal ulcers, 22 prepyloric and 13 non-juxtapyloric gastric ulcers. One hundred and sixty-five patients underwent omental patch closure of perforations; there were six Pólya gastrectomies and one ulcerectomy. Thirty-seven patients (21.5 per cent) required conversion to laparotomy. The mean operating time was 64.8 (range 14-180) min. The median postoperative requirement for intramuscular pethidine was one dose. The median postoperative hospital stay was 6 days. Complications occurred in 28 patients (16.3 per cent) resulting in three reoperations. Six patients with intra-abdominal collections were managed by percutaneous drainage. Two patients who underwent conversion developed a wound infection. Fourteen patients (8.1 per cent) died, 11 of whom were American Society of Anesthesiologists grade III and IV.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer is a safe emergency procedure in routine clinical practice for patients with perforated pyloroduodenal ulcer. Copyright 2004 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15048752     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  30 in total

1.  Technical feasibility of laparoscopic Finney pyloroplasty examined in a canine model.

Authors:  F M Sánchez-Margallo; B Loscertales; I Díaz-Güemes; J Usón
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Routine laparoscopic single-stitch omental patch repair for perforated peptic ulcer: experience from 338 cases.

Authors:  D C T Wong; W T Siu; S K H Wong; Y P Tai; M K W Li
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Perforated peptic ulcer: clinical presentation, surgical outcomes, and the accuracy of the Boey scoring system in predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  Varut Lohsiriwat; Siriluck Prapasrivorakul; Darin Lohsiriwat
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Treatment for perforated gastric ulcer: a multi-institutional retrospective review.

Authors:  Ryo Tanaka; Shin-ichi Kosugi; Kaoru Sakamoto; Kazuhito Yajima; Takashi Ishikawa; Tatsuo Kanda; Toshifumi Wakai
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: single-center results.

Authors:  Simone Guadagni; Ismail Cengeli; Christian Galatioto; Niccolò Furbetta; Vincenzo Lippolis Piero; Giuseppe Zocco; Massimo Seccia
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Comparison of laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated duodenal ulcers.

Authors:  R Lunevicius; M Morkevicius
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Management strategies, early results, benefits, and risk factors of laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Raimundas Lunevicius; Matas Morkevicius
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Gastrotomy closure using bioabsorbable plugs in a canine model.

Authors:  Theodore J Cios; Kevin M Reavis; David R Renton; Jeffrey W Hazey; Dean J Mikami; Vimal K Narula; Matthew T Allemang; S Scott Davis; W Scott Melvin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-08-19       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopic primary repair with omentopexy for duodenal ulcer perforation: a single institution experience of 21 cases.

Authors:  Chung Hyeun Ma; Min Gyu Kim
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 3.720

Review 10.  Laparoscopic correction of perforated peptic ulcer: first choice? A review of literature.

Authors:  Mariëtta J O E Bertleff; Johan F Lange
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.