Literature DB >> 15047404

Radionuclide tumour therapy with ultrasound contrast microbubbles.

Annemieke van Wamel1, Ayache Bouakaz, Bert Bernard, Folkert ten Cate, Nico de Jong.   

Abstract

Radionuclides have shown to be effective in tumour therapy. However, the side effects determine the maximum deliverable dose. Recently, it has been demonstrated that cells can be permeabilised through sonoporation using ultrasound and contrast microbubbles. The use of sonoporation in treatment of tumours may increase the anti-tumour efficacy of radionuclide treatment. The mechanisms as well as the effects sonoporation in tumour treatment strategies are still not understood. The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of ultrasound and contrast microbubbles on the internalisation of the radionuclide (111)In-DOTA-Tyr(3)-octreotate in tumour cells. To optimize ultrasound settings for ultrasound adjunctive tumour therapy we incubated rat pancreatic CA20948 tumour cells with two dyes (MW 40 and 70 kDa). The uptake levels were compared with cells treated with ultrasound and contrast microbubbles for different ultrasound settings. The highest molecular uptake was found with addition of contrast microbubbles (ratio of 10 bubbles to 1 cell) and with the ultrasound setting: duty cycle 0.013%, mechanical index (MI) 0.42, and treatment times of 30 and 60 min. These settings were used to enhance the internalisation of (111)In-DOTA-Tyr(3)-octreotate. We found a 160% higher internalisation of (111)In-DOTA-Tyr(3)-octreotate by tumour cells adjunctively treated with ultrasound and contrast microbubbles compared to untreated cells. These results show that adjunctive tumour treatment with the radionuclide (111)In-DOTA-Tyr(3)-octreotate and ultrasound contrast microbubbles may be feasible. When using adjunctive ultrasound contrast microbubble treatment, a lower radionuclide doses are required to reach the same anti-tumour effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15047404     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2003.11.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasonics        ISSN: 0041-624X            Impact factor:   2.890


  10 in total

Review 1.  Contrast-enhanced and targeted ultrasound.

Authors:  Michiel Postema; Odd Helge Gilja
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Ultrasound-biophysics mechanisms.

Authors:  William D O'Brien
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 3.667

3.  Ultrasound attenuation estimation using backscattered echoes from multiple sources.

Authors:  Timothy A Bigelow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Microbubbles in ultrasound-triggered drug and gene delivery.

Authors:  Sophie Hernot; Alexander L Klibanov
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 15.470

5.  Multiparameter evaluation of in vivo gene delivery using ultrasound-guided, microbubble-enhanced sonoporation.

Authors:  Galina Shapiro; Andrew W Wong; Maxim Bez; Fang Yang; Sarah Tam; Lisa Even; Dmitriy Sheyn; Shiran Ben-David; Wafa Tawackoli; Gadi Pelled; Katherine W Ferrara; Dan Gazit
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 9.776

6.  Pulsed ultrasound enhances nanoparticle penetration into breast cancer spheroids.

Authors:  Stephanie J Grainger; Juliana Valencia Serna; Steffi Sunny; Yun Zhou; Cheri X Deng; Mohamed E H El-Sayed
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Examination of inertial cavitation of Optison in producing sonoporation of chinese hamster ovary cells.

Authors:  Monica M Forbes; Ryan L Steinberg; William D O'Brien
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Ultrasound-mediated cavitation enhances the delivery of an EGFR-targeting liposomal formulation designed for chemo-radionuclide therapy.

Authors:  Eloise Thomas; Jyothi U Menon; Joshua Owen; Irini Skaripa-Koukelli; Sheena Wallington; Michael Gray; Christophoros Mannaris; Veerle Kersemans; Danny Allen; Paul Kinchesh; Sean Smart; Robert Carlisle; Katherine A Vallis
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2019-07-28       Impact factor: 11.600

Review 9.  Imaging and cancer: a review.

Authors:  Leonard Fass
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2008-05-10       Impact factor: 7.449

10.  High Yielding Microbubble Production Method.

Authors:  Joe Fiabane; Paul Prentice; Ketan Pancholi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 3.411

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.