Literature DB >> 15046990

Finite element models predict cancellous apparent modulus when tissue modulus is scaled from specimen CT-attenuation.

Benjamin C Bourne1, Marjolein C H van der Meulen.   

Abstract

High-resolution architecture-based finite element models are commonly used for characterizing the mechanical behavior of cancellous bone. The vast majority of studies use homogeneous material properties to model trabecular tissue. The objectives of this study were to demonstrate that inhomogeneous finite element models that account for microcomputed tomography-measured tissue modulus variability more accurately predict the apparent stiffness of cancellous bone than homogeneous models, and to examine the sensitivity of an inhomogeneous model to the degree of tissue property variability. We tested five different material cases in finite element models of ten cancellous cubes in simulated uniaxial compression. Three of these cases were inhomogeneous and two were homogeneous. Four of these cases were unique to each specimen, and the remaining case had the same tissue modulus for all specimens. Results from all simulations were compared with measured elastic moduli from previous experiments. Tissue modulus variability for the most accurate of the three inhomogeneous models was then artificially increased to simulate the effects of non-linear CT-attenuation-modulus relationships. Uniqueness of individual models was more critical for model accuracy than level of inhomogeneity. Both homogeneous and inhomogeneous models that were unique to each specimen had at least 8% greater explanatory power for apparent modulus than models that applied the same material properties to all specimens. The explanatory power for apparent modulus of models with a tissue modulus coefficient of variation (COV) range of 21-31% was 13% greater than homogeneous models (COV=0). The results of this study indicate that inhomogenous finite element models that have tissue moduli unique to each specimen more accurately predict the elastic behavior of cancellous cubic specimens than models that have common tissue moduli between all specimens.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15046990     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2003.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  31 in total

1.  Multi-scale modelling of elastic moduli of trabecular bone.

Authors:  Elham Hamed; Iwona Jasiuk; Andrew Yoo; Yikhan Lee; Tadeusz Liszka
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  3D image analysis and artificial intelligence for bone disease classification.

Authors:  Abdurrahim Akgundogdu; Rachid Jennane; Gabriel Aufort; Claude Laurent Benhamou; Osman Nuri Ucan
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  Cancellous bone adaptation to tibial compression is not sex dependent in growing mice.

Authors:  Maureen E Lynch; Russell P Main; Qian Xu; Daniel J Walsh; Mitchell B Schaffler; Timothy M Wright; Marjolein C H van der Meulen
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2010-06-24

4.  Testing two predictions for fracture load using computer models of trabecular bone.

Authors:  Michael A K Liebschner; Ralph Müller; Sunil J Wimalawansa; Chamith S Rajapakse; Gemunu H Gunaratne
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-05-06       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  A biomechanical analysis of the effects of resorption cavities on cancellous bone strength.

Authors:  Christopher J Hernandez; Atul Gupta; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Non-invasive monitoring of tissue scaffold degradation using ultrasound elasticity imaging.

Authors:  Kang Kim; Claire G Jeong; Scott J Hollister
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 8.947

7.  Predicting mouse vertebra strength with micro-computed tomography-derived finite element analysis.

Authors:  Jeffry S Nyman; Sasidhar Uppuganti; Alexander J Makowski; Barbara J Rowland; Alyssa R Merkel; Julie A Sterling; Todd L Bredbenner; Daniel S Perrien
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2015-04-22

8.  In vivo micro-CT scanning of a rabbit distal femur: repeatability and reproducibility.

Authors:  Michael J Voor; Shuo Yang; Robert L Burden; Seid W Waddell
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Regional variation of bone tissue properties at the human mandibular condyle.

Authors:  Do-Gyoon Kim; Yong-Hoon Jeong; Erin Kosel; Amanda M Agnew; David W McComb; Kyle Bodnyk; Richard T Hart; Min Kyung Kim; Sang Yeun Han; William M Johnston
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Theoretical bounds for the influence of tissue-level ductility on the apparent-level strength of human trabecular bone.

Authors:  Shashank Nawathe; Frédéric Juillard; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.