Literature DB >> 23600657

Development and in vitro evaluation of a nanoemulsion for transcutaneous delivery.

Grace Ledet1, Sarala Pamujula, Valencia Walker, Shana Simon, Richard Graves, Tarun K Mandal.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to develop a nanoemulsion formulation for its use as a transcutaneous vaccine delivery system.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: With bovine albumin-fluorescein isothiocyanate conjugate (FITC-BSA) as a vaccine model, formulations were selected with the construction of pseudo-ternary phase diagrams and a short-term stability study. The size of the emulsion droplets was furthered optimized with high-pressure homogenization. The optimized formulation was evaluated for its skin permeation efficiency. In vitro skin permeation studies were conducted with shaved BALB/c mice skin samples with a Franz diffusion cell system. Different drug concentrations were compared, and the effect of the nanoemulsion excipients on the permeation of the FITC-BSA was also studied.
RESULTS: The optimum homogenization regime was determined to be five passes at 20 000 psi, with no evidence of protein degradation during processing. With these conditions, the particle diameter was 85.2 nm ± 15.5 nm with a polydispersity index of 0.186 ± 0.026 and viscosity of 14.6 cP ± 1.2 cP. The optimized formulation proved stable for 1 year at 4 °C. In vitro skin diffusion studies show that the optimized formulation improves the permeation of FITC-BSA through skin with an enhancement ratio of 4.2 compared to a neat control solution. Finally, a comparison of the skin permeation of the nanoemulsion versus only the surfactant excipients resulted in a steady state flux of 23.44 μg/cm(2)/h for the nanoemulsion as opposed to 6.10 μg/cm(2)/h for the emulsifiers.
CONCLUSION: A novel nanoemulsion with optimized physical characteristics and superior skin permeation compared to control solution was manufactured. The formulation proposed in this study has the flexibility for the incorporation of a variety of active ingredients and warrants further development as a transcutaneous vaccine delivery vehicle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23600657      PMCID: PMC3758445          DOI: 10.3109/03639045.2012.763137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Dev Ind Pharm        ISSN: 0363-9045            Impact factor:   3.225


  36 in total

1.  The adjuvanted influenza vaccines with novel adjuvants: experience with the MF59-adjuvanted vaccine.

Authors:  A Podda
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2001-03-21       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Safety and long-term humoral immune response in adults after vaccination with an H1N1 2009 pandemic influenza vaccine with or without AS03 adjuvant.

Authors:  Murdo Ferguson; George Risi; Matthew Davis; Eric Sheldon; Mira Baron; Ping Li; Miguel Madariaga; Louis Fries; Olivier Godeaux; David Vaughn
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 3.  Nano-emulsions and micro-emulsions: clarifications of the critical differences.

Authors:  Nicolas Anton; Thierry F Vandamme
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2010-11-06       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 4.  DNA delivery for vaccination and therapeutics through the skin.

Authors:  Marianna Foldvari; Shawn Babiuk; Ildiko Badea
Journal:  Curr Drug Deliv       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 5.  Formulation effects of topical emulsions on transdermal and dermal delivery.

Authors:  A Otto; J du Plessis; J W Wiechers
Journal:  Int J Cosmet Sci       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.970

6.  Enhanced humoral and Type 1 cellular immune responses with Fluzone adjuvanted with a synthetic TLR4 agonist formulated in an emulsion.

Authors:  Susan L Baldwin; Narek Shaverdian; Yasuyuki Goto; Malcolm S Duthie; Vanitha S Raman; Tara Evers; Farah Mompoint; Thomas S Vedvick; Sylvie Bertholet; Rhea N Coler; Steven G Reed
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 3.641

7.  Adjuvant System AS03 containing α-tocopherol modulates innate immune response and leads to improved adaptive immunity.

Authors:  Sandra Morel; Arnaud Didierlaurent; Patricia Bourguignon; Sophie Delhaye; Benoît Baras; Valérie Jacob; Camille Planty; Abdelatif Elouahabi; Pol Harvengt; Harald Carlsen; Anders Kielland; Patrick Chomez; Nathalie Garçon; Marcelle Van Mechelen
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 3.641

8.  Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4.

Authors:  U K Laemmli
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-08-15       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Formation and stability of nano-emulsions.

Authors:  Tharwat Tadros; P Izquierdo; J Esquena; C Solans
Journal:  Adv Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2004-05-20       Impact factor: 12.984

10.  Enhancement of humoral response against human influenza vaccine with the simple submicron oil/water emulsion adjuvant MF59.

Authors:  G Ott; G L Barchfeld; G Van Nest
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.641

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Effect of vaccine administration modality on immunogenicity and efficacy.

Authors:  Lu Zhang; Wei Wang; Shixia Wang
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 5.217

Review 2.  Topical Nano and Microemulsions for Skin Delivery.

Authors:  Christofori M R R Nastiti; Thellie Ponto; Eman Abd; Jeffrey E Grice; Heather A E Benson; Michael S Roberts
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 6.321

3.  Nano-particle engineered atorvastatin delivery to support mesenchymal stem cell survival in infarcted myocardium.

Authors:  Guang-Tao Yao; Li-Ping Song; Wan-Hua Xue; Guo-Hai Su; Ai-Hua Ning; Jin Wang
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 4.  Recent Advancements in Non-Invasive Formulations for Protein Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Rajiv Bajracharya; Jae Geun Song; Seung Yun Back; Hyo-Kyung Han
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 7.271

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.