Literature DB >> 15045529

[Stability of osteosyntheses for condylar head fractures in the clinic and biomechanical simulation].

A Neff1, G Mühlberger, M Karoglan, A Kolk, W Mittelmeier, D Scheruhn, H-H Horch, S Kock, H Schieferstein.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fractures of the condylar head are traditionally managed by closed techniques, despite a considerable rate of dysfunctional problems. PDS pin osteosynthesis (presented by Rasse 1992) via a preauricular approach failed to become established as a standard procedure due to a lack of stability. Alternatively, mini- or microplating, as performed in our patients (101 condylar head fractures between 1993 and 2000), showed high-grade limitations of translatory movements in about 30% due to scarification after loosening of osteosynthesis materials. The aim of this study was to establish an efficient procedure for achieving a functionally stable and atraumatic osteosynthesis.
METHODS: For the definition of a suitable procedure, models of the mandible (standardized fractures, types A, B, and C) were osteosynthesized (six samples for each type of fracture and type of screw), each with three PDS pins, 2.0 mm resorbable, 2.0 cortical, 1.7 and 1.2 mm small fragment screws, and exposed to increasing loads in centric (0-20-35 mm opening) and eccentric (35 mm opening) condylar positions. A computerized biomechanical test stand allowed a dynamic simulation of chewing forces (16 hydraulic drives). The resulting fracture gaps were measured without contact by a motion capture system.
RESULTS: Within physiological limits, only 1.7 small fragment and 2.0 mm cortical screws were able to bear occlusal loadings up to 200 N (1.2 mm small fragment screws up to 150 N, resorbable 2.0 mm screws up to 100 N, and PDS-pins up to 50 N). In a pullout experiment (condylar spongious bone of young pigs, aged 4-6 months), 1.7 mm small fragment screws showed superior retention. A consecutively developed small fragment screw-system has been applied clinically in 74 condylar head fractures (58 patients). After removal of osteosynthesis material, 41 of 49 TM joints have so far shown complete restitution.
CONCLUSIONS: The newly developed osteosynthesis system using a retroauricular approach based on 1.7 mm small fragment screws makes maxillomandibular immobilization unnecessary. The extra-articular position of the screw heads prevents scar-induced articular limitations. Preexisting degenerative alterations of the TMJ soft tissues, however, will affect functional results adversely.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15045529     DOI: 10.1007/s10006-004-0529-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir        ISSN: 1432-9417


  20 in total

1.  [Mechanical stimulation of osteoblasts in cell culture].

Authors:  U Meyer; M Terodde; U Joos; H P Wiesmann
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2001-05

2.  Development of a static simulator of the mandible.

Authors:  C Meyer; J L Kahn; A Lambert; P Boutemy; A Wilk
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  [Cytokine-induced nitric oxide production of joint cartilage cells in continuous passive movement. Anti-inflammatory effect of continuous passive movement on chondrocytes: in vitro study].

Authors:  R Gassner; M J Buckley; N Piesco; C Evans; S Agarwal
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2000-09

4.  Biomechanical model of the human mandible: a hypothesis involving stabilizing activity of the superior belly of lateral pterygoid muscle.

Authors:  V Ferrario; C Sforza
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.426

5.  Current consensus on the management of fractures of the mandibular condyle. A method by questionnaire.

Authors:  A W Baker; J McMahon; K F Moos
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.789

6.  [Nuclear magnetic resonance tomography study of the position of the discus articularis after dislocation fractures].

Authors:  U Eckelt; S Klengel
Journal:  Fortschr Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  1996

7.  [Position and mobility of the articular disk after surgical management of diacapitular and high condylar dislocation fractures of the temporomandibular joint].

Authors:  A Neff; A Kolk; H H Horch
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2000-03

8.  [Experimental study on the biomechanical stability of different internal fixators for use in the mandible].

Authors:  J Piffkò; Ch Homann; R Schuon; U Joos; U Meyer
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2002-10-11

9.  Occlusal and temporomandibular joint disorders in patients with unilateral condylar fracture. A prospective one-year study.

Authors:  U Silvennoinen; A M Raustia; C Lindqvist; K Oikarinen
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.789

10.  The natural course of nonreducing disk displacement of the temporomandibular joint: changes in condylar mobility and radiographic alterations at one-year follow up.

Authors:  S Sato; K Takahashi; H Kawamura; K Motegi
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.789

View more
  14 in total

1.  Evaluation of a new optical measuring system for experiments on fractured human mandibles: a biomechanical feasibility study in maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  T Steiner; S Raith; S Eichhorn; S Doebele; S Trainotti; S Müller; M Eder; L Kovacs; R Burgkart; K-D Wolff; F Hölzle
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Condylar segment removal in the management of diacapitular mandibular fractures.

Authors:  Ashish Chakranarayan; B Mukherjee
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-07-27

3.  [Small fragment screws vs. plate osteosynthesis in condylar head fractures].

Authors:  A Neff; A Kolk; F Meschke; H Deppe; H-H Horch
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2005-03

4.  The use of BoneWelding® technology in spinal surgery: an experimental study in sheep.

Authors:  Dorothee Heidenreich; Jens D Langhoff; Katja Nuss; Katharina Kluge; Käthi Kämpf; Katalin Zlinsky; Monika Hilbe; Jörg Mayer; Brigitte von Rechenberg
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Application of CAD/CAM technology for surgical treatment of condylar head fractures: A preliminary study.

Authors:  Tetiana Pavlychuk; Denis Chernogorskyi; Yurii Chepurnyi; Andreas Neff; Andrii Kopchak
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2020-08-27

Review 6.  Open versus closed reduction: diacapitular fractures of the mandibular condyle.

Authors:  Bruno Ramos Chrcanovic
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-07-28

7.  A comparative biomechanical evaluation of different osteosynthesis techniques used for intracapsular condylar head fractures.

Authors:  T Pavlychuk; M Shydlovsky; A Kopchak
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2019-02-07

8.  Correlation between Condylar Fracture Pattern after Parasymphyseal Impact and Condyle Morphological Features: A Retrospective Analysis of 107 Chinese Patients.

Authors:  Lu Han; Ting Long; Wei Tang; Lei Liu; Wei Jing; Wei-Dong Tian; Jie Long
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 9.  Variants and Modifications of the Retroauricular Approach Using in Temporomandibular Joint Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Maciej Sikora; Maciej Chęciński; Zuzanna Nowak; Dariusz Chlubek
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Are Magnesium Screws Proper for Mandibular Condyle Head Osteosynthesis?

Authors:  Marcin Kozakiewicz
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 3.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.