Literature DB >> 15044559

Effects of opioids in morphine-treated pigeons trained to discriminate among morphine, the low-efficacy agonist nalbuphine, and saline.

Ellen A Walker1, Mitchell J Picker, Arthur Granger, Linda A Dykstra.   

Abstract

In opioid-dependent subjects, the low-efficacy mu agonist nalbuphine generally precipitates withdrawal or withdrawal-like stimulus effects. To provide a more complete characterization of the discriminative stimulus effects of nalbuphine in opioid-treated subjects, seven White Carneux pigeons were treated daily with 10 mg/kg morphine i.m. and trained 6 h later to discriminate among 10 mg/kg morphine, 1.0 mg/kg nalbuphine, and saline by responding on one of three different keys. When tested, morphine produced morphine-key responding and nalbuphine produced nalbuphine-key responding. Replacing the daily morphine injection with saline produced nalbuphine-key responding, and this effect was reversed by the administration of morphine. In substitution tests with other compounds, the antagonists naltrexone (i.m.) and CTAP (D-Phe-Cys-Tyr-D-Tryp-Lys-Thr-Pen-Thr-NH2) (i.c.v.) produced nalbuphine-key responding. High-efficacy agonists fentanyl and etorphine produced morphine-key responding. The intermediate-efficacy agonists buprenorphine, dezocine, and butorphanol produced a pattern of morphine-, saline-, and/or nalbuphine-key responding that differed across individual pigeons. The lower efficacy agonists nalorphine and levallorphan produced predominantly nalbuphine-key responding. The kappa agonists spiradoline and U50,488 [trans-3,4-dichloro-N-methyl-N-(2-[1-pyrrolidinyl]cyclohexyl)benzeneacetamide methanesulfonate], the nonopioid d-amphetamine, and saline produced predominantly saline-key responding. Naltrexone and nalbuphine dose dependently reversed the morphine-key responding produced by the training dose of morphine. Together, these data suggest that the discriminative-stimulus effects of the low-efficacy micro agonist nalbuphine in morphine-treated pigeons are similar to those of other low-efficacy agonists, naltrexone, and the termination of daily morphine treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15044559     DOI: 10.1124/jpet.103.058503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther        ISSN: 0022-3565            Impact factor:   4.030


  6 in total

1.  A multicenter randomized double-blind prospective study of the postoperative patient controlled intravenous analgesia effects of dezocine in elderly patients.

Authors:  Chunying Wang; Lizhi Li; Boxiong Shen; Hui Jiang; Lan Yuan; Dongping Shi; Junfeng Zhu; Xuan Guo; Hua Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-03-15

2.  Opioid antagonists differ according to negative intrinsic efficacy in a mouse model of acute dependence.

Authors:  Ellen A Walker; Steven N Sterious
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  Postoperative analgesia using dezocine alleviates depressive symptoms after colorectal cancer surgery: A randomized, controlled, double-blind trial.

Authors:  Peng Zhao; Zhuoxi Wu; Chunrui Li; Guiying Yang; Jinping Ding; Kai Wang; Mingming Wang; Lijuan Feng; Guangyou Duan; Hong Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Preoperative administration of intramuscular dezocine reduces postoperative pain for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Yaomin Zhu; Guixia Jing; Wei Yuan
Journal:  J Biomed Res       Date:  2011-09

5.  Living without DAT: Loss and compensation of the dopamine transporter gene in sauropsids (birds and reptiles).

Authors:  P V Lovell; B Kasimi; J Carleton; T A Velho; C V Mello
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Measuring ligand efficacy at the mu-opioid receptor using a conformational biosensor.

Authors:  Kathryn E Livingston; Jacob P Mahoney; Aashish Manglik; Roger K Sunahara; John R Traynor
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 8.140

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.