Literature DB >> 15041746

Tigers and their prey: Predicting carnivore densities from prey abundance.

K Ullas Karanth1, James D Nichols, N Samba Kumar, William A Link, James E Hines.   

Abstract

The goal of ecology is to understand interactions that determine the distribution and abundance of organisms. In principle, ecologists should be able to identify a small number of limiting resources for a species of interest, estimate densities of these resources at different locations across the landscape, and then use these estimates to predict the density of the focal species at these locations. In practice, however, development of functional relationships between abundances of species and their resources has proven extremely difficult, and examples of such predictive ability are very rare. Ecological studies of prey requirements of tigers Panthera tigris led us to develop a simple mechanistic model for predicting tiger density as a function of prey density. We tested our model using data from a landscape-scale long-term (1995-2003) field study that estimated tiger and prey densities in 11 ecologically diverse sites across India. We used field techniques and analytical methods that specifically addressed sampling and detectability, two issues that frequently present problems in macroecological studies of animal populations. Estimated densities of ungulate prey ranged between 5.3 and 63.8 animals per km2. Estimated tiger densities (3.2-16.8 tigers per 100 km2) were reasonably consistent with model predictions. The results provide evidence of a functional relationship between abundances of large carnivores and their prey under a wide range of ecological conditions. In addition to generating important insights into carnivore ecology and conservation, the study provides a potentially useful model for the rigorous conduct of macroecological science.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15041746      PMCID: PMC387338          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0306210101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  2 in total

Review 1.  Unanswered questions in ecology.

Authors:  R May
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1999-12-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  A common rule for the scaling of carnivore density.

Authors:  Chris Carbone; John L Gittleman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-03-22       Impact factor: 47.728

  2 in total
  67 in total

1.  The bigger they come, the harder they fall: body size and prey abundance influence predator-prey ratios.

Authors:  Chris Carbone; Nathalie Pettorelli; Philip A Stephens
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Coincidence or evidence: was the sabretooth cat Smilodon social?

Authors:  Christian Kiffner
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Commensal in conflict: Livestock depredation patterns by free-ranging domestic dogs in the Upper Spiti Landscape, Himachal Pradesh, India.

Authors:  Chandrima Home; Ranjana Pal; Rishi Kumar Sharma; Kulbhushansingh R Suryawanshi; Yash Veer Bhatnagar; Abi Tamim Vanak
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 5.129

4.  The shrinking ark: patterns of large mammal extinctions in India.

Authors:  Krithi K Karanth; James D Nichols; K Ullas Karanth; James E Hines; Norman L Christensen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Anthropogenic and environmental drivers of modern range loss in large mammals.

Authors:  Charles B Yackulic; Eric W Sanderson; María Uriarte
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Standardizing the double-observer survey method for estimating mountain ungulate prey of the endangered snow leopard.

Authors:  Kulbhushansingh R Suryawanshi; Yash Veer Bhatnagar; Charudutt Mishra
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  The influence of agroforestry and other land-use types on the persistence of a Sumatran tiger (Panthera tigris sumatrae) population: an individual-based model approach.

Authors:  Muhammad Ali Imron; Sven Herzog; Uta Berger
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 3.266

8.  Bringing the tiger back from the brink-the six percent solution.

Authors:  Joe Walston; John G Robinson; Elizabeth L Bennett; Urs Breitenmoser; Gustavo A B da Fonseca; John Goodrich; Melvin Gumal; Luke Hunter; Arlyne Johnson; K Ullas Karanth; Nigel Leader-Williams; Kathy Mackinnon; Dale Miquelle; Anak Pattanavibool; Colin Poole; Alan Rabinowitz; James L D Smith; Emma J Stokes; Simon N Stuart; Chanthavy Vongkhamheng; Hariyo Wibisono
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  A tiger cannot change its stripes: using a three-dimensional model to match images of living tigers and tiger skins.

Authors:  Lex Hiby; Phil Lovell; Narendra Patil; N Samba Kumar; Arjun M Gopalaswamy; K Ullas Karanth
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Why the Indian subcontinent holds the key to global tiger recovery.

Authors:  Samrat Mondol; K Ullas Karanth; Uma Ramakrishnan
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.