PURPOSE: Siltuximab is a chimeric, anti-interleukin-6 monoclonal antibody with potential therapeutic benefit in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients. We assessed the safety and tolerability of siltuximab in combination with docetaxel, the pharmacokinetics of docetaxel alone and with siltuximab, and the efficacy and pharmacodynamics of siltuximab plus docetaxel. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In an open-label, dose-escalation, multicenter, phase 1 study, patients with metastatic, progressive CRPC received docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) q3w plus siltuximab 6 mg/kg q2w (n=12), 9 mg/kg q3w (n=12), or 12 mg/kg q3w (n=15). Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), PSA, and radiologic response according to WHO criteria were evaluated. RESULTS: DLT was reported in 1 of 11 patients receiving 6 mg/kg, 1 of 12 receiving 9 mg/kg, and in 1 of 14 receiving 12 mg/kg. Common Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were neutropenia (73 %), leukopenia (60 %), lymphopenia (30 %), dyspnea (19 %), and fatigue (14 %). Toxicities were not dose dependent. Siltuximab did not affect docetaxel pharmacokinetics. The pharmacokinetic profile for siltuximab in combination was similar to single-agent siltuximab pharmacokinetics. Twenty-three (62 %; 95 % CI 45 %, 78 %) of 37 combination-treated patients achieved a confirmed ≥ 50 % PSA decline. Of 17 patients with measurable disease at baseline, 2 confirmed and 2 unconfirmed radiologic partial responses ranging 190 to 193 days were achieved with 9- and 12-mg/kg siltuximab. C-reactive protein concentrations were suppressed throughout treatment in all patients. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that siltuximab in combination with docetaxel is safe and shows preliminary efficacy in patients with CRPC, although alternative siltuximab schedules may be better tolerated for future studies.
PURPOSE:Siltuximab is a chimeric, anti-interleukin-6 monoclonal antibody with potential therapeutic benefit in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients. We assessed the safety and tolerability of siltuximab in combination with docetaxel, the pharmacokinetics of docetaxel alone and with siltuximab, and the efficacy and pharmacodynamics of siltuximab plus docetaxel. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In an open-label, dose-escalation, multicenter, phase 1 study, patients with metastatic, progressive CRPC received docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) q3w plus siltuximab 6 mg/kg q2w (n=12), 9 mg/kg q3w (n=12), or 12 mg/kg q3w (n=15). Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), PSA, and radiologic response according to WHO criteria were evaluated. RESULTS: DLT was reported in 1 of 11 patients receiving 6 mg/kg, 1 of 12 receiving 9 mg/kg, and in 1 of 14 receiving 12 mg/kg. Common Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were neutropenia (73 %), leukopenia (60 %), lymphopenia (30 %), dyspnea (19 %), and fatigue (14 %). Toxicities were not dose dependent. Siltuximab did not affect docetaxel pharmacokinetics. The pharmacokinetic profile for siltuximab in combination was similar to single-agent siltuximab pharmacokinetics. Twenty-three (62 %; 95 % CI 45 %, 78 %) of 37 combination-treated patients achieved a confirmed ≥ 50 % PSA decline. Of 17 patients with measurable disease at baseline, 2 confirmed and 2 unconfirmed radiologic partial responses ranging 190 to 193 days were achieved with 9- and 12-mg/kg siltuximab. C-reactive protein concentrations were suppressed throughout treatment in all patients. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that siltuximab in combination with docetaxel is safe and shows preliminary efficacy in patients with CRPC, although alternative siltuximab schedules may be better tolerated for future studies.
Authors: J-F Rossi; S Négrier; N D James; I Kocak; R Hawkins; H Davis; U Prabhakar; X Qin; P Mulders; B Berns Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2010-08-31 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Ian F Tannock; Ronald de Wit; William R Berry; Jozsef Horti; Anna Pluzanska; Kim N Chi; Stephane Oudard; Christine Théodore; Nicholas D James; Ingela Turesson; Mark A Rosenthal; Mario A Eisenberger Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-10-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Dawid G Nowak; Hyejin Cho; Tali Herzka; Kaitlin Watrud; Daniel V DeMarco; Victoria M Y Wang; Serif Senturk; Christof Fellmann; David Ding; Tumas Beinortas; David Kleinman; Muhan Chen; Raffaella Sordella; John E Wilkinson; Mireia Castillo-Martin; Carlos Cordon-Cardo; Brian D Robinson; Lloyd C Trotman Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2015-03-31 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Stephanie C Casey; Amedeo Amedei; Katia Aquilano; Asfar S Azmi; Fabian Benencia; Dipita Bhakta; Alan E Bilsland; Chandra S Boosani; Sophie Chen; Maria Rosa Ciriolo; Sarah Crawford; Hiromasa Fujii; Alexandros G Georgakilas; Gunjan Guha; Dorota Halicka; William G Helferich; Petr Heneberg; Kanya Honoki; W Nicol Keith; Sid P Kerkar; Sulma I Mohammed; Elena Niccolai; Somaira Nowsheen; H P Vasantha Rupasinghe; Abbas Samadi; Neetu Singh; Wamidh H Talib; Vasundara Venkateswaran; Richard L Whelan; Xujuan Yang; Dean W Felsher Journal: Semin Cancer Biol Date: 2015-04-10 Impact factor: 15.707
Authors: Lei Gu; Pooja Talati; Paraskevi Vogiatzi; Ana L Romero-Weaver; Junaid Abdulghani; Zhiyong Liao; Benjamin Leiby; David T Hoang; Tuomas Mirtti; Kalle Alanen; Michael Zinda; Dennis Huszar; Marja T Nevalainen Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2014-02-27 Impact factor: 6.261