BACKGROUND: Traditional and modern treatments are proposed for thoracic empyema. The efficacy of video-assisted thocoscopic surgery (VATS) has been studied when the method is applied either as primary treatment for thoracic empyema or after the failure of fibrinolytic therapy. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients treated with VATS for thoracic empyema have been reviewed. Of those, 20 patients (group 1) with empyema thoracis were referred to VATS after failure of the fibrinolytic treatment. Another 18 patients (group 2) with primary empyema thoracis were treated thoracoscopically immediately when empyema was diagnosed. Both groups were staged 5, 6, or 7 according to Light's criteria. RESULTS: The group 2 patients showed a higher empyema resolving rate (95% versus 85%), shorter hospital stay (4.5 versus 7.5 days), and significantly shorter duration of the procedure (70 +/- 14 versus 62 +/- 10 minutes) in comparison with the patients of group 1. CONCLUSIONS: The VATS technique for thoracic empyema is a well-tolerated, minimally invasive technique, with excellent therapeutic results, mild postoperative complications, and reduced hospitalization. VATS should be considered as the treatment of choice for thoracic empyema, in the fibrinopurulent stage, as it is more effective when applied primarily than when applied after fibrinolytic therapy.
BACKGROUND: Traditional and modern treatments are proposed for thoracic empyema. The efficacy of video-assisted thocoscopic surgery (VATS) has been studied when the method is applied either as primary treatment for thoracic empyema or after the failure of fibrinolytic therapy. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients treated with VATS for thoracic empyema have been reviewed. Of those, 20 patients (group 1) with empyema thoracis were referred to VATS after failure of the fibrinolytic treatment. Another 18 patients (group 2) with primary empyema thoracis were treated thoracoscopically immediately when empyema was diagnosed. Both groups were staged 5, 6, or 7 according to Light's criteria. RESULTS: The group 2 patients showed a higher empyema resolving rate (95% versus 85%), shorter hospital stay (4.5 versus 7.5 days), and significantly shorter duration of the procedure (70 +/- 14 versus 62 +/- 10 minutes) in comparison with the patients of group 1. CONCLUSIONS: The VATS technique for thoracic empyema is a well-tolerated, minimally invasive technique, with excellent therapeutic results, mild postoperative complications, and reduced hospitalization. VATS should be considered as the treatment of choice for thoracic empyema, in the fibrinopurulent stage, as it is more effective when applied primarily than when applied after fibrinolytic therapy.
Authors: Martin Reichert; Matthias Hecker; Biruta Witte; Johannes Bodner; Winfried Padberg; Markus A Weigand; Andreas Hecker Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2016-11-04 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: R Epaud; G Aubertin; M Larroquet; H Ducou-le Pointe; P Helardot; A Clement; B Fauroux Journal: Pediatr Surg Int Date: 2006-02-21 Impact factor: 1.827
Authors: Michael A Wait; Daniel L Beckles; Michelle Paul; Margaret Hotze; Michael J Dimaio Journal: J Minim Access Surg Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 1.407