Literature DB >> 15041136

Rhythmic context influences the auditory evoked potentials of musicians and non-musicians.

Marijtje L A Jongsma1, Peter Desain, Henkjan Honing.   

Abstract

In this study, we investigated how rhythms are processed in the brain by measuring both behaviourally obtained ratings and auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) from the EEG. We presented probe beats on seven positions within a test bar. Two bars of either a duple- or triple meter rhythm preceded probe beats. We hypothesised that sequential processing would lead to meter effects at the 1/3 and 1/2bar positions, whereas hierarchical processing would lead to context effects on the 1/3, 1/2 and 2/3bar positions. We found that metric contexts affected behavioural ratings. This effect was more pronounced for rhythmic experts. In addition, both the AEP P3a and P3b component could be identified. Though metric context affected the P3a amplitudes, group effects were less clear. We found that the AEP P3a component is sensitive to violation of temporal expectancies. In addition, behavioural data and P3a correlation coefficients (CCs) suggest that temporal patterns are processed sequentially in nonmusicians but are processed in a hierarchical way in rhythmic experts.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15041136     DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2003.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  17 in total

1.  Event-related potentials to changes of rhythmic unit: differences between musicians and nonmusicians.

Authors:  Pekcan Ungan; Türev Berki; Nurhan Erbil; Suha Yagcioglu; Mehmet Yüksel; Rezzan Utkucal
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 3.307

2.  Rhythm evokes action: early processing of metric deviances in expressive music by experts and laymen revealed by ERP source imaging.

Authors:  Clara E James; Christoph M Michel; Juliane Britz; Patrik Vuilleumier; Claude-Alain Hauert
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Perception of phrase structure in music.

Authors:  Thomas R Knösche; Christiane Neuhaus; Jens Haueisen; Kai Alter; Burkhard Maess; Otto W Witte; Angela D Friederici
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Cortical Activity during Perception of Musical Rhythm; Comparing Musicians and Non-musicians.

Authors:  Assal Habibi; Vinthia Wirantana; Arnold Starr
Journal:  Psychomusicology       Date:  2014-06-01

5.  Musical Meter Modulates the Allocation of Attention across Time.

Authors:  Ahren B Fitzroy; Lisa D Sanders
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Cortical plasticity induced by short-term multimodal musical rhythm training.

Authors:  Claudia Lappe; Laurel J Trainor; Sibylle C Herholz; Christo Pantev
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Violation of rhythmic expectancies can elicit late frontal gamma activity nested in theta oscillations.

Authors:  M Edalati; M Mahmoudzadeh; J Safaie; F Wallois; S Moghimi
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 4.348

8.  Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) detect rhythmic groups in music, but not the beat.

Authors:  Henkjan Honing; Hugo Merchant; Gábor P Háden; Luis Prado; Ramón Bartolo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Source analysis of electrophysiological correlates of beat induction as sensory-guided action.

Authors:  Neil P M Todd; Christopher S Lee
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-14

10.  Semantics, syntax or neither? A case for resolution in the interpretation of N500 and P600 responses to harmonic incongruities.

Authors:  Cara R Featherstone; Catriona M Morrison; Mitch G Waterman; Lucy J MacGregor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.