Literature DB >> 15040795

Involving users in low back pain research.

Bie Nio Ong1, Helen Hooper.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To involve users in the design of a research project that aims at describing a 12-month course of low back pain in an adult population sample (epidemiological strand), and to determine how patient and professional perceptions of low back pain and its treatment relate to the use of health-care and to subsequent outcome (qualitative strand).
DESIGN: Three focus groups were organized in the preparatory phase of the project with general practitioners, other health professionals and low back pain sufferers. Issues pertaining to the experience of living with, or treating low back pain were explored and users were asked to identify relevant research questions for consideration within the study.
FINDINGS: The focus groups revealed tensions between involving users as co-researchers for design issues and their role as sufferers and health professionals who want to share their narrative accounts of low back pain. The group discussions produced a wealth of material for analysis, but no explicitly stated research topics. Three key themes and the process of user involvement in the focus groups are discussed.
CONCLUSIONS: The focus group format could be restrictive in that it allows for detailed exchange between participants, but is insufficiently geared towards the production of a research agenda. We draw conclusions as to possible approaches for user involvement in health services research design.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 15040795      PMCID: PMC5060206          DOI: 10.1046/j.1369-7625.2003.00230.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  22 in total

Review 1.  Participatory research maximises community and lay involvement. North American Primary Care Research Group.

Authors:  A C Macaulay; L E Commanda; W L Freeman; N Gibson; M L McCabe; C M Robbins; P L Twohig
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-18

2.  Back pain in Britain: comparison of two prevalence surveys at an interval of 10 years.

Authors:  K T Palmer; K Walsh; H Bendall; C Cooper; D Coggon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-06-10

3.  The power of the visible: the meaning of diagnostic tests in chronic back pain.

Authors:  L A Rhodes; C A McPhillips-Tangum; C Markham; R Klenk
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Role of users of health care in achieving a quality service.

Authors:  A Hopkins; J Gabbay; J Neuberger
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1994-12

Review 5.  Focus groups.

Authors:  R A Powell; H M Single
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.038

6.  Reluctant rationers: public input to health care priorities.

Authors:  J Lomas
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  1997-04

7.  Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques.

Authors:  M Ryan; D A Scott; C Reeves; A Bate; E R van Teijlingen; E M Russell; M Napper; C M Robb
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.014

8.  Chronic low back pain in general practice: the challenge of the consultation.

Authors:  C Chew-Graham; C May
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.267

9.  General practitioner perceptions of low back pain patients.

Authors:  A M Skelton; E A Murphy; R J Murphy; T C O'Dowd
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.267

10.  The causes of disease. Women talking.

Authors:  M Blaxter
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  16 in total

1.  User involvement in the development of a research bid: barriers, enablers and impacts.

Authors:  Sophie Staniszewska; Nicola Jones; Mary Newburn; Shanit Marshall
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Increasing the relevance of research to underserved communities: lessons learned from a retreat to engage community health workers with researchers.

Authors:  Heather Angier; Noelle Wiggins; Jessica Gregg; Rachel Gold; Jennifer DeVoe
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2013-05

3.  Patient and public involvement in patient-reported outcome measures: evolution not revolution.

Authors:  Sophie Staniszewska; Kirstie L Haywood; Jo Brett; Liz Tutton
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 4.  Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jo Brett; Sophie Staniszewska; Carole Mockford; Sandra Herron-Marx; John Hughes; Colin Tysall; Rashida Suleman
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Patients' priorities concerning health research: the case of asthma and COPD research in the Netherlands.

Authors:  J Francisca Caron-Flinterman; Jacqueline E W Broerse; Julia Teerling; Joske F G Bunders
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  What women want from women's reproductive health research: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Shilpi Pandey; Maureen Porter; Siladitya Bhattacharya
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Co-development and Usability Testing of Research 101: A Patient-Oriented Research Curriculum in Child Health (PORCCH) E-Learning Module for Patients and Families.

Authors:  Catharine M Walsh; Nicola L Jones; Graham A McCreath; Veronik Connan; Linda Pires; Autumn Q H Chen; Aliza Karoly; Colin Macarthur
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 3.569

8.  Active Patient Engagement: Long Overdue in Rehabilitation Research.

Authors:  Samantha Louise Harrison; Dina Brooks
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.037

Review 9.  A systematic review of the impact of patient and public involvement on service users, researchers and communities.

Authors:  Jo Brett; Sophie Staniszewska; Carole Mockford; Sandra Herron-Marx; John Hughes; Colin Tysall; Rashida Suleman
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

10.  'I felt like a human being'-An exploratory, multi-method study of refugee involvement in the development of mental health intervention research.

Authors:  Georgina Warner; Zaruhi Baghdasaryan; Fatumo Osman; Elin Lampa; Anna Sarkadi
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.