Literature DB >> 15039794

Evaluation and quality control of personal nephelometers in indoor, outdoor and personal environments.

Chang-Fu Wu1, Ralph J Delfino, Joshua N Floro, Behzad S Samimi, Penelope J E Quintana, Michael T Kleinman, L-J Sally Liu.   

Abstract

Personal nephelometers provide useful real-time measurements of airborne particulate matter (PM). Recent studies have applied this tool to assess personal exposures and related health effects. However, a thorough quality control (QC) procedure for data collected from such a device in a large-scale exposure assessment study is lacking. We have evaluated the performance of a personal nephelometer (personal DataRAM or pDR) in the field. We present here a series of post hoc QC procedures for improving the quality of the pDR data. The correlations and the ratios between the pDRs and the collocated gravimetric measurements were used as indices of the pDR data quality. The pDR was operated in four modes: passive (no pump), active (with personal sampling pumps), active with a heated inlet, and a humidistat. The pDRs were worn by 21 asthmatic children, placed at their residences indoors and outdoors, as well as at a central site. All fixed-site pDRs were collocated with Harvard Impactors for PM2.5 (HI2.5). By examining the differences between the time-weighted average concentrations calculated from the real-time pDRs' readings and recorded internally by the pDRs, we identified 9.1% of the pDRs' measurements suffered from negative drifts. By comparing the pDRs' daily base level with the HI2.5 measurements, we identified 5.7% of the pDRs' measurements suffered from positive drifts. High relative humidity (RH) affected outdoor pDR measurements, even when a heater was used. Results from a series of chamber experiments suggest that the heated air stream cooled significantly after leaving the heater and entering the pDR light-scattering chamber. An RH correction equation was applied to the pDR measurements to remove the RH effect. The final R2 values between the fixed-site pDRs and the collocated HI2.5 measurements ranged between 0.53 and 0.72. We concluded that with a carefully developed QC procedure, personal nephelometers can provide high-quality data for assessing PM exposures on subjects and at fixed locations. We also recommend that outdoor pDRs be operated in the active mode without a heater and that the RH effect be corrected with an RH correction equation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15039794     DOI: 10.1038/sj.jea.7500351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol        ISSN: 1053-4245


  10 in total

1.  An inexpensive light-scattering particle monitor: field validation.

Authors:  Zohir Chowdhury; Rufus D Edwards; Michael Johnson; Kyra Naumoff Shields; Tracy Allen; Eduardo Canuz; Kirk R Smith
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2007-07-20

2.  Variation in gravimetric correction factors for nephelometer-derived estimates of personal exposure to PM2.5.

Authors:  Jessica Tryner; Nicholas Good; Ander Wilson; Maggie L Clark; Jennifer L Peel; John Volckens
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 8.071

3.  Sources of error and variability in particulate matter sensor network measurements.

Authors:  Christopher Zuidema; Larissa V Stebounova; Sinan Sousan; Geb Thomas; Kirsten Koehler; Thomas M Peters
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 2.155

4.  Predicting Airborne Particle Levels Aboard Washington State School Buses.

Authors:  Sara D Adar; Mark Davey; James R Sullivan; Michael Compher; Adam Szpiro; L-J Sally Liu
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.798

5.  Examining the representativeness of home outdoor PM(2.5), EC, and OC estimates for daily personal exposures in Southern California.

Authors:  Regina E Ducret-Stich; Ralph J Delfino; Thomas Tjoa; Armin Gemperli; Alex Ineichen; Jun Wu; Harish C Phuleria; L-J Sally Liu
Journal:  Air Qual Atmos Health       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 3.763

6.  Measurement of particle concentrations in a dental office.

Authors:  Maria Sotiriou; Stephen F Ferguson; Mark Davey; Jack M Wolfson; Philip Demokritou; Joy Lawrence; Sonja N Sax; Petros Koutrakis
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 3.307

7.  Humidity and gravimetric equivalency adjustments for nephelometer-based particulate matter measurements of emissions from solid biomass fuel use in cookstoves.

Authors:  Sutyajeet Soneja; Chen Chen; James M Tielsch; Joanne Katz; Scott L Zeger; William Checkley; Frank C Curriero; Patrick N Breysse
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Validation of a light-scattering PM2.5 sensor monitor based on the long-term gravimetric measurements in field tests.

Authors:  Jingjin Shi; Fei'er Chen; Yunfei Cai; Shichen Fan; Jing Cai; Renjie Chen; Haidong Kan; Yihan Lu; Zhuohui Zhao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  PM2.5 Concentration and Composition in Subway Systems in the Northeastern United States.

Authors:  David G Luglio; Maria Katsigeorgis; Jade Hess; Rebecca Kim; John Adragna; Amna Raja; Colin Gordon; Jonathan Fine; George Thurston; Terry Gordon; M J Ruzmyn Vilcassim
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Estimating Indoor PM2.5 and CO Concentrations in Households in Southern Nepal: The Nepal Cookstove Intervention Trials.

Authors:  Chen Chen; Scott Zeger; Patrick Breysse; Joanne Katz; William Checkley; Frank C Curriero; James M Tielsch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.