Literature DB >> 15039161

Time interval between abnormalities seen on CT and the clinical diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: retrospective review of CT scans obtained before diagnosis.

Sumana Gangi1, J G Fletcher, Mark A Nathan, Jared A Christensen, William S Harmsen, Brian S Crownhart, Suresh T Chari.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine whether abdominal CT can detect pancreatic cancer before its clinical diagnosis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Two radiologists interpreted in a blinded manner 62 CT scans in 28 pancreatic cancer patients that were obtained before histologic diagnosis and 89 CT scans in 89 control subjects and noted specific CT findings. The presence of pancreatic cancer was characterized as definite, suspicious, low probability, or normal. The scans of the pancreatic cancer patients were divided into four groups on the basis of the time interval preceding cancer diagnosis (0-2, 2-6, 6-18, or > 18 months), and one scan (closest to 18 months) was selected per patient per time interval. Sensitivity and specificity for pancreatic cancer and interobserver agreement for CT findings were calculated.
RESULTS: Radiologists agreed that CT findings definite or suspicious for pancreatic cancer were present in 50% of the scans obtained 2-6 and 6-18 months before the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer (3/6 and 4/8 scans, respectively), but they noted such CT findings in only 7% (1/15) of the scans obtained more than 18 months before diagnosis. Pancreatic duct dilatation and cutoff were early CT findings identified by both radiologists and were associated with near-perfect and substantial interobserver agreement (kappa = 0.84 and 0.76, respectively). Ninety-five percent confidence intervals of specificity for tumor absence ranged from 92% to 100%.
CONCLUSION: CT can detect a significant proportion of asymptomatic incident pancreatic cancers before the clinical diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. CT should be considered in screening at-risk patient populations. Pancreatic duct dilatation and cutoff are early findings associated with the development of pancreatic cancer and can be detected on CT with a high degree of reproducibility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15039161     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.182.4.1820897

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  58 in total

1.  Characteristic magnetic resonance features of focal autoimmune pancreatitis useful for differentiation from pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Yukiko Sugiyama; Yasunari Fujinaga; Masumi Kadoya; Kazuhiko Ueda; Masahiro Kurozumi; Hideaki Hamano; Shigeyuki Kawa
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  Initial Misdiagnosis of Proximal Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Is Associated with Delay in Diagnosis and Advanced Stage at Presentation.

Authors:  Douglas S Swords; Mary C Mone; Chong Zhang; Angela P Presson; Sean J Mulvihill; Courtney L Scaife
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  White paper on pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from society of abdominal radiology's disease-focused panel for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Part II, update on imaging techniques and screening of pancreatic cancer in high-risk individuals.

Authors:  Naveen M Kulkarni; Lorenzo Mannelli; Marc Zins; Priya R Bhosale; Hina Arif-Tiwari; Olga R Brook; Elizabeth M Hecht; Fay Kastrinos; Zhen Jane Wang; Erik V Soloff; Parag P Tolat; Guillermo Sangster; Jason Fleming; Eric P Tamm; Avinash R Kambadakone
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-03

4.  Development of pancreatic cancer is predictable well in advance using contrast-enhanced CT: a case-cohort study.

Authors:  Wataru Gonoi; Takana Yamakawa Hayashi; Hidemi Okuma; Masaaki Akahane; Yousuke Nakai; Suguru Mizuno; Ryosuke Tateishi; Hiroyuki Isayama; Kazuhiko Koike; Kuni Ohtomo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Detecting early pancreatic cancer: problems and prospects.

Authors:  Suresh T Chari
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.929

6.  Radiological error: analysis, standard setting, targeted instruction and teamworking.

Authors:  Richard FitzGerald
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-02-23       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Dual energy CT: preliminary observations and potential clinical applications in the abdomen.

Authors:  Anno Graser; Thorsten R C Johnson; Hersh Chandarana; Michael Macari
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-08-02       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Plasma protein profiling in a stage defined pancreatic cancer cohort - Implications for early diagnosis.

Authors:  Anna Sandström Gerdtsson; Christer Wingren; Helena Persson; Payam Delfani; Malin Nordström; He Ren; Xin Wen; Ulrika Ringdahl; Carl A K Borrebaeck; Jihui Hao
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 6.603

9.  Temporal association of changes in fasting blood glucose and body mass index with diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Rahul Pannala; Cynthia L Leibson; Kari G Rabe; Lawrence J Timmons; Jeanine Ransom; Mariza de Andrade; Gloria M Petersen; Suresh T Chari
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Pancreatic adenocarcinoma in a patient with situs inversus: a case report of this rare coincidence.

Authors:  Eric L Sceusi; Curtis J Wray
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 2.754

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.