Literature DB >> 15038888

The presumption in favour of liberty: a comment on the HFEA's public consultation on sex selection.

Edgar Dahl1.   

Abstract

In its recently published report 'Sex Selection: Options for Regulation', the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) concluded that sex selection for non-medical reasons should not be permitted in the United Kingdom. The HFEA's recommendation to ban sex selection for any but the most serious of medical reasons clearly reflects the majority view of UK citizens. Notwithstanding the general moral consensus against non-medical sex selection, the HFEA's approach to social policy needs to be criticised for betraying the commonly held presumption in favour of liberty.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15038888     DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60906-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  4 in total

Review 1.  Sex selection: laissez faire or family balancing?

Authors:  Edgar Dahl
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2005-03

2.  Social sex selection and the balance of the sexes: empirical evidence from Germany, the UK, and the US.

Authors:  E Dahl; M Beutel; B Brosig; S Grüssner; Y Stöbel-Richter; H-R Tinneberg; Elmar Brähler
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2006-09-17       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Engendering Harm: A Critique of Sex Selection For "Family Balancing".

Authors:  Arianne Shahvisi
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 1.352

4.  Preconception sex selection for non-medical and intermediate reasons: ethical reflections.

Authors:  G de Wert; W Dondorp
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2010
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.